Weather

Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #489 – Watts Up With That?


The Week That Was: 2022-01-29 (January 29, 2022)
Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org)
The Science and Environmental Policy Project

Quote of the Week: “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” – Albert Einstein

Number of the Week: $5,000 a month. $60,000 per year.

THIS WEEK:

By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)

Scope: TWTW will finish its summary of major developments in climate science over the past year with a review of books by Steve Koonin and Mototaka Nakamura. Next week will include an overview. Both Koonin and Nakamura understand climate modeling and expose deficiencies in establishment climate science and modeling procedures.

Personal attacks on Canadian Jordan Peterson exemplified the importance of these deficiencies. Peterson resigned as full professor at the University of Toronto because the political correctness of the University became stultifying, preventing open thought and exploration of ideas. In a Tweet, Peterson cited a book by SEPP founder S. Fred Singer as a source for stating climate models have major errors. That statement brought out the usual attack dogs making bizarre, unsubstantiated claims.

The issue of Net Zero carbon emissions continues to intensify as some citizens realize that the political leaders advocating Net Zero have no idea of the costs involved, and the costs continue to escalate. This is particularly true in the UK where it is becoming obvious that the policies are becoming disastrous, and no one thought the issues out.

TWTW compares the funding SEPP received from Heartland (which was attacked) with funding of three principal US modeling entities: NCAR/UCAR, Princeton’s Cooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth System (CIMES), and NASA/GISS. The reader can personally evaluate undue monetary influence.

On a lighter side, weather forecasts stated the town in which Ken Haapala lived as a child would receive 2 to 3 feet of snow over the weekend. The children in Massachusetts will still know what snow is.

****************

Unproven Hypothesis: In July 2018, established climate modeler Mototaka Nakamura had published the Japanese Version of Confessions of a climate scientist: The global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis. On July 25, 2020, TWTW reviewed it and discussed it several times thereafter. It reinforced Richard Lindzen’s invited paper in The European Physical Journal Plus in June 2020, on climate change reviewed in TWTW in June and July of that year, Lindzen stated:

  1. The core of the system consists in two turbulent fluids (the atmosphere and oceans) interacting with each other.
  • The two fluids are on a rotating planet that is differentially [unevenly] heated by the sun and unevenly absorbing the solar warming. Solar rays directly hit the equator and skim the earth at the poles resulting in uneven heating, which drives the circulation of the atmosphere. The result is heat transport from the equator towards the poles (meridional).
  • The earth’s climate system is never in equilibrium. [Boldface added]
  • In addition to the oceans, the atmosphere is interacting with a hugely irregular land surface distorting the airflow, causing planetary scale waves, which are not accurately described in climate models.
  •  A vital component of the atmosphere is water in its liquid, solid, and vapor phases, and the changes in phases have immense dynamic consequences. Each phase affects incoming and outgoing radiation differently. Substantial heat is released when water vapor condenses, driving thunder clouds. Further, clouds consist of water in the form of fine droplets and ice crystals. Normally, these are suspended by rising air currents, but when these grow large enough, they fall as rain and snow. The energies involved in phase changes are important, as well as the fact that both water vapor and clouds strongly affect radiation.

“The two most important greenhouse substances by far are water vapor and clouds. Clouds are also important reflectors of sunlight. These matters are discussed in detail in the IPCC WG1 reports, each of which openly acknowledge clouds as major sources of uncertainty in climate modeling.” [Boldface added]

[Despite that acknowledgement, the IPCC Summaries to Policymakers largely ignore these uncertainties.]

  • “The energy budget of this system involves the absorption and reemission of about 240 W/m2 [Watts per square meter]. Doubling CO2 involves a perturbation [deviation] a bit less than 2% to this budget (4 W/m2) So do changes in clouds and other features, and such changes are common. The Earth receives about 340 W/m2 from the sun, but about 100 W/m2 is simply reflected back to space by both the Earth’s surface and, more importantly, by clouds. This would leave about 240 W/m2 that the Earth would have to emit in order to establish balance. The sun radiates in the visible portion of the radiation spectrum because its temperature is about 6000 K. If the Earth had no atmosphere at all (but for purposes of argument still was reflecting 100 W/m2), it would have to radiate at a temperature of about 255 K, and, at this temperature, the radiation is mostly in the infrared.”

The oceans and the atmosphere introduce a host of complications including evaporation creating water vapor which strongly absorbs and emits radiation in the infrared.

“The water vapor essentially blocks infrared radiation from leaving the surface, causing the surface and (via conduction) the air adjacent to the surface to heat, and convection sets in. The combination of the radiative and the convective processes results in decreasing temperature with height [lapse rate]. To make matters more complicated, the amount of water vapor that the air can hold decreases rapidly as the temperature decreases. Above some height there is so little water vapor remaining that radiation from this level can now escape to space. It is at this elevated level (around 5 km) that the temperature must be about 255 K in order to balance incoming radiation. However, because the temperature decreases with height, the surface of the Earth now has to actually be warmer than 255 K. It turns out that it has to be about 288 K (which is indeed the average temperature of the earth’s surface). The addition of other greenhouse gases (like CO2) increases further the emission level and causes an additional increase of the ground temperature. Doubling CO2 is estimated to be equivalent to a forcing of about 4W/m2 which is a little less than 2% of the net incoming 240 W/m2.

“The situation can actually be more complicated if upper-level cirrus clouds are present. They are very strong absorbers and emitters of infrared radiation and effectively block infrared radiation from below. Thus, when such clouds are present above about 5 km, their tops, rather than 5 km determine the emission level. This makes the ground temperature (i.e., the greenhouse effect) dependent on the cloud coverage.

Many factors, including fluctuations of average cloud area and height, snow cover, ocean circulations, etc. commonly cause changes to the radiative budget comparable to that of doubling of CO2. For example, the net global mean cloud radiative effect is of the order of − 20 W/m2 (cooling effect). A 4 W/m2 forcing, from a doubling of CO2, therefore corresponds to only a 20% change in the net cloud effect. [Boldface added]

  • It is important to note that such a system will fluctuate with timescales ranging from seconds to millennia even in the absence of explicit forcing other than a steady Sun. Much of the popular literature (on both sides of the climate debate) assumes that all changes must be driven by some external factor. [Boldface added]

Simply put, global climate modelers have failed to capture the enormous complexity of the climate system. Further, what the climate modelers produce has major deficiencies. Among other important changing phenomena, the climate system is largely made up of two fluids in dynamic motion, the ocean, and the atmosphere, and we simply do not know enough about fluid dynamics to make long-term predictions about the interactions of these fluids. According to Nakamura the climate models are useful tools for academic purposes, but useless for prediction.

The beginning of Nakamura’s book states:

“Before pointing out a few of the serious flaws in climate simulation models, in defense of those climate researchers who use climate simulation models for various meaningful scientific projects, I want to emphasize here that climate simulation models are fine tools to study the climate system, so long as the users are aware of the limitations of the models and exercise caution in designing experiments and interpreting their output. In this sense, experiments to study the response of simplified climate systems, such as those generated by the ‘state-of-the-art’ climate simulation models, to major increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases are also interesting and meaningful academic projects that are certainly worth pursuing. So long as the results of such projects are presented with disclaimers that unambiguously state the extent to which the results can be compared with the real world, I would not have any problem with such projects. The models just become useless pieces of junk or worse (worse, in a sense that they can produce gravely misleading output) only when they are used for climate forecasting.

“All climate simulation models have many details that become fatal flaws when they are used as climate forecasting tools, especially for mid- to long-term (several years and longer) climate variations and changes. These models completely lack some of critically important climate processes and feedbacks and represent some other critically important climate processes and feedbacks in grossly distorted manners to the extent that makes these models totally useless for any meaningful climate prediction. It means that they are also completely useless for assessing the effects of the past atmospheric carbon dioxide increase on the climate. I myself used to use climate simulation models for scientific studies, not for predictions, and learned about their problems and limitations in the process.” [Boldface added]

So much for the popular press science claiming, “scientists say.” See links under Challenging the Orthodoxy and the referenced TWTWs.

****************

Uncertainty: In his 2021book, Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters (reviews in the May 20 and June 3 TWTWs) Koonin writes:

“The process of science is less about collecting pieces of knowledge than it is about reducing the uncertainties in what we know. Our uncertainties can be greater or lesser for any given piece of knowledge depending upon where we are in that process—today we are quite certain of how an apple will fall from a tree, but our understanding of turbulent fluid flow (such as convection in the atmosphere) remains a work in progress after more than a century of effort.”

“Every measurement of the physical world has an associated uncertainty interval (usually denoted by the Greek letter sigma: σ). We can’t say what the measurement’s true value is precisely, only that it is likely to be within some range specified by σ. Thus, we might say the global mean surface temperature in 2016 was 14.85ºC with a σ of 0.07ºC. That is, there is a two-thirds chance that the true value is between 14.78 and 14.92ºC.”

For a scientist, knowing the uncertainty in a measurement is as important as knowing the measurement itself, because it allows you to judge the significance of differences between measurements…” [pp. 18 & 19, Boldface added]

As Under Secretary for Science at the United States Department of Energy under President Obama, he was responsible for assuring the nuclear arsenal was properly maintained. Since the US no longer does nuclear testing, it is required that the models used to ensure proper maintenance were reliable. Perhaps Koonin was prompted to explore the issues further by the exchange he had as moderator of a debate on man-made global warming (sponsored by the American Physical Society).As Rupert Darwall wrote:

“The ensuing dialogue between Koonin and Dr. William Collins of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory – a lead author of the climate model evaluation chapter in the Fifth Assessment Report – revealed something more troubling and deliberate than holes in scientific knowledge:

  • Dr. Koonin: But if the model tells you that you got the response to the forcing wrong by 30 percent, you should use that same 30 percent factor when you project out a century.
  • Dr. Collins: Yes. And one of the reasons we are not doing that is we are not using the models as [a] statistical projection tool.
  • Dr. Koonin: What are you using them as?
  • Dr. Collins: Well, we took exactly the same models that got the forcing wrong and which got sort of the projections wrong up to 2100.
  • Dr. Koonin: So, why do we even show centennial-scale projections?
  • Dr. Collins: Well, I mean, it is part of the [IPCC] assessment process.

Whether he knows it or not, Collins states there is no integrity in the modeling process creating models used by the IPCC to make projections / predictions. Thus, they are misleading and unreliable. See links under Challenging the Orthodoxy, Seeking a Common Ground and the referenced TWTWs.

****************

The Attack Dogs Bark: Clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson resigned as full professor at the University of Toronto because the political correctness of the University became stultifying, preventing open thought and exploration of ideas. He states:

“First, my qualified and supremely trained heterosexual white male graduate students (and I’ve had many others, by the way) face a negligible chance of being offered university research positions, despite stellar scientific dossiers. This is partly because of Diversity, Inclusivity and Equity mandates (my preferred acronym: DIE). These have been imposed universally in academia, despite the fact that university hiring committees had already done everything reasonable for all the years of my career, and then some, to ensure that no qualified “minority” candidates were ever overlooked. My students are also partly unacceptable precisely because they are my students.”

He then goes on to write:

“Second reason: This is one of many issues of appalling ideology currently demolishing the universities and, downstream, the general culture. Not least because there simply are not enough qualified BIPOC people in the pipeline to meet diversity targets quickly enough (BIPOC: black, indigenous and people of colour, for those of you not in the knowing woke). This has been common knowledge among any remotely truthful academic who has served on a hiring committee for the last three decades. This means we’re out to produce a generation of researchers utterly unqualified for the job. And we’ve seen what that means already in the horrible grievance studies ‘disciplines.’”

The headline of an article by reporter Graham Readfearn of The Guardian was: “Word salad of nonsense’: scientists denounce Jordan Peterson’s comments on climate models,” and “Peterson claimed the climate was too complex to be modelled accurately, which was quickly shot down by scientists.” The Guardian article lists the usual suspects and some new ones. One of those participating was Gavin Schmidt of NASA/GISS, which produces highly questionable surface-based temperature data. [As Nakamura discusses in his book, surface-based data covers less than five percent of the earth’s surface and the records are questionable.]

DeSmog International picked up that Peterson cites Hot Talk, Cold Science and lashes into SEPP founder S. Fred Singer and donations to The Heartland Institute:

“…which has taken donations from oil interests including ExxonMobil and the Koch family. Singer was a speaker at a 2012 Heartland conference where sponsors received $67 million from Exxon, Koch and the Scaife Family Foundations.”

TWTW will leave it to The Heartland Institute and the living authors of the latest edition of Hot Talk, Cold Science to address these false claims, including the $67 million which is probably more than the sum of all donations to The Heartland Institute ever. From this and the discussion above, it becomes clear that many “climate scientists” do not understand the limitations of the models they use, which is critical for improving their models. See links under Challenging the Orthodoxy and Communicating Better to the Public – Go Personal.

****************

Net Zero: Europe’s quest for Net Zero, energy systems with no carbon dioxide emissions, is turning into a clear example of what happens when foolish political leaders try to implement foolish policies based on foolish climate models. Amusingly, Lubos Motl reports that coal rich Ostrava in the Czech Republic imported coal from Australia. It was metallurgical coal, not thermal coal used in power plants. But this version of “carrying coals to Newcastle” (a former major producing area in the UK) gives an amusing view to current pointless actions involved in government policy in Europe, especially the UK, and in Washington and by various states.

For Texas and New England, the situation may become dire. As Donn Dears writes, Texas does not have adequate reliable reserve in electricity and another Blu Norther will be an emergency. As for New England, Paul Homewood writes:

“Although natural gas provides nearly half of New England’s electricity, about three quarters of gas consumption goes elsewhere, mainly for residential heating:”

“There is no easy way to say this. People will die, and lots of them, if Joe Biden’s crazy green agenda is implemented.”

As of this writing, the snow in Massachusetts has stopped, but total accumulations are not yet available. As of 6 pm EST on January 29, several towns reported over two feet and south Boston was approaching two feet. The January 30 forecast for Boston is windy and cold with temperatures falling to 5 degrees F (minus 15 C). In northern New England it will be colder.

No doubt, contrary to what some may claim, this big Nor’easter may have broken records for snow, but it was not caused by human-caused global warming. Any statistics produced for claiming probability for the event are meaningless. Using patterns from previous years and numerical forecasting, WeatherBELL LLC was predicting a major storm event at least a week out. Exact details were not known.

Perhaps the closest to net zero this week was achieved by wind power transmitted by the BPA Balancing Authority, with a total wind nameplate capacity of about 2925 MW. On January 25 it briefly peaked at about one-tenth of that and bounced off zero a number of times since. See links under Changing Weather, Questioning European Green, Questioning Green Elsewhere, Energy Issues, Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Solar and Wind, https://transmission.bpa.gov/Business/Operations/Wind/twndbspt.png

****************

Leadership By Example? Many Western attendees at the UN’s 26th Conference of Parties (COP 26) in Glasgow were urging “leadership by example.” But China, the biggest emitter of CO2, and India are not following. As Paul Homewood writes about China’s leader Xi:

“It is not clear whether Xi was genuine in his desire originally to reduce emissions, or whether he was playing the West on a piece of string.

“But as I have repeatedly commented, the CCP needs to keep growing China’s economy to survive. If their leader stands in the way, he is dead meat.

“Sooner or later then reality was going to catch up. The refusal of China to phase out coal at COP26 was a strong sign of the way the CCP was going, that economic realists were winning the battle with environmentalists. I suspect that Xi has seen the writing on the wall and is siding with the only winners in this battle.

“Nobody would argue that China does not want to tackle genuine environmental problems, such as air pollution. Nor that they won’t embrace energy efficient technology.

“But it must now be clear that carbon dioxide is well down their list of concerns.”

See links under Problems in the Orthodoxy

****************

Number of the Week: $5,000 a month. $60,000 per year. According to DeSmog,

“In 2014 DeSmog revealed that Singer received $5,000 a month from US right-wing think tank the Heartland Institute…”

Except for the adjective “right-wing”, TWTW does not contest that.

Looking at the latest budgets that are readily available:

  • in FY 2018 the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) received $126,340,000;
  • between July 1, 2018, and March 31, 2019, Princeton’s Cooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth System (CIMES) received $5 million;
  • a report by NASA’s Inspector General that found deficiencies at NASA/GISS stated the funding “totaled $19.1 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2016.”

These “premier” US climate modeling entities receive tens of millions of dollars from the public yet fail to address their modeling deficiencies. The models are used to justify policies that will harm the public. See Communicating Better to the Public – Go Personal, https://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2020/pdf/40r_fy2020.pdf. file:///C:/Users/Owner/Downloads/final_2018-2019_cimes_annual_progress_report.pdf, and

Science: Is the Sun Rising?

Ancient ice reveals mysterious solar storm

By Staff Writers, Lund, Sweden (SPX) Jan 27, 2022

https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Ancient_ice_reveals_mysterious_solar_storm_999.html

Link to paper: Cosmogenic radionuclides reveal an extreme solar particle storm near a solar minimum 9125 years BP

By Chiara I. Paleari, et al., Nature Communications, Jan 11, 2022

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27891-4

Challenging the Orthodoxy — NIPCC

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science

Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), 2013

Summary: https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/CCR/CCR-II/Summary-for-Policymakers.pdf

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts

Idso, Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), 2014

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/climate-change-reconsidered-ii-biological-impacts/

Summary: https://www.heartland.org/media-library/pdfs/CCR-IIb/Summary-for-Policymakers.pdf

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels

By Multiple Authors, Bezdek, Idso, Legates, and Singer eds., Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, April 2019

http://store.heartland.org/shop/ccr-ii-fossil-fuels/

Download with no charge:

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Climate-Change-Reconsidered-II-Fossil-Fuels-FULL-Volume-with-covers.pdf

Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming

The NIPCC Report on the Scientific Consensus

By Craig D. Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer, Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), Nov 23, 2015

http://climatechangereconsidered.org/

Download with no charge:

https://www.heartland.org/policy-documents/why-scientists-disagree-about-global-warming

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate

S. Fred Singer, Editor, NIPCC, 2008

http://www.sepp.org/publications/nipcc_final.pdf

Global Sea-Level Rise: An Evaluation of the Data

By Craig D. Idso, David Legates, and S. Fred Singer, Heartland Policy Brief, May 20, 2019

Challenging the Orthodoxy

An oversimplified picture of the climate behavior based on a single process can lead to distorted conclusions

By Richard S. Lindzen, The European Physical Journal Plus, June 3, 2020

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00471-z

Jordan Peterson: Why I Am No Longer A Tenured Professor at the University of Toronto

January 21, 2022

By Jordan Peterson, Independent.org, Jan 21, 2022

https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=13962&omhide=true&trk=rm

Be Grateful for Global Warming

By Gregory Wrightstone, CO2 Coalition, Jan 28, 2022

2021: Warming as usual?

By David Whitehouse, Net Zero Watch, Jan 25, 2022

Civilization needs courageous warriors, not pitiful, helpless giants

Without coal, oil and natural gas, civilization would still be stuck where it was 200 years ago.

By Wallace Manheimer, American Greatness, Jan 23, 2022

https://amgreatness.com/2022/01/23/civilization-needs-courageous-warriors-not-pitiful-helpless-giants/

“How did this policy of appeasement affect the energy industry over the last decade? Companies were sued by several West Coast cities for imagined climate change.  There are at least 40 members of Congress elected in 2018 and 2020 supporting the Green New Deal. And teams of lawyers are circling the oil companies like a pride of lions circling a wounded zebra.”

Climate Alarmist Claim Fact Checks

By Joseph D’Aleo, CCM, ICECAP, Jan 25, 2022

http://icecap.us/index.php/go/political-climate/alarmist_claim_rebuttals_updated/

What Solution Do Renewable Energy Advocates Offer For The Problem Of Storage?

By Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian, Jan 22, 2022

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2022-1-22-what-solution-do-renewable-energy-advocates-offer-for-the-problem-of-storage

[SEPP Comment: A magic wand?]

Defending the Orthodoxy

Gina McCarthy: Why I’m more optimistic than ever on tackling the climate crisis

By Gina McCarthy, The Hill, Jan 20, 2022

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/590524-gina-mccarthy-why-im-more-optimistic-than-ever-on-tackling-the

[SEPP Comment: Of course, she cannot define the crisis with physical evidence.]

Kerry warns about efforts to blunt climate change: ‘We’re in trouble’

By Zack Budryk, The Hill, Jan 24, 2022

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/591049-kerry-warns-about-efforts-to-blunt-climate-change-were-in-trouble

“’That’s a problem … there’s just no other way to cut it. Coal is the dirtiest fuel on the planet, no one has figured out how to make it clean, even though they talk about clean coal,’ Kerry added, attributing ‘the worst’ of climate change to coal use.”

[SEPP Comment: Try breathing smoke from dung cooking fires!]

Methane in the atmosphere is at an all-time high. What it means for climate change

By Euan Nisbet, The Conversation, Phys.org, Jan 17, 2022 [H/t Bernie Kepshire]

https://phys.org/news/2022-01-methane-atmosphere-all-time-high-climate.html

“Methane hitting 1,900 ppb is a fire alarm. We cannot stop natural wetland emissions. But human-caused emissions can be reduced, quickly. At COP26 in Glasgow—the most recent UN climate change summit in November 2021—more than 100 nations signed the Global Methane Pledge, promising to cut methane emissions 30% by 2030.”

Importance of Methane

By Staff, EPA.gov, Accessed Jan 28, 2022

https://www.epa.gov/gmi/importance-methane#:~:text=Methane%20is%20more%20than%2025,trapping%20heat%20in%20the%20atmosphere.&text=Because%20methane%20is%20both%20a,effect%20on%20atmospheric%20warming%20potential.

“Methane is more than 25 times as potent as carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere. Over the last two centuries, methane concentrations in the atmosphere have more than doubled, largely due to human-related activities.”

Defending the Orthodoxy – Bandwagon Science

Al Gore on his hopes for the planet: “Job number one is to stop using the sky as an open sewer”

By Staff, CBS, Jan 13, 2022

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/al-gore-climate-change/

“He has been sounding the climate alarm for more than four decades — first as a young congressman and then 15 years ago, with his film “An Inconvenient Truth.”

“It earned him an Oscar, a Nobel Peace Prize, and plenty of scorn from climate change deniers.”

[SEPP Comment: Carbon dioxide makes the atmosphere a sewer?]

Guest post: Why oceans could face more extremes like the Pacific ‘Blob’

By Profs Gruber, Boyd, Frolicher, and Dr. Vogt, Carbon Brief, Jan 24, 2022

Link to paper: Biogeochemical extremes and compound events in the ocean

By Gruber, Boyd, Frolicher, and Vogt, Nature Dec 15, 2021

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03981-7

Lost birds and mammals spell doom for some plants

Animal-dispersed plants’ ability to keep pace with climate change reduced by 60%

Press Release, NSF, Jan 24, 2022

https://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?WT.mc_id=USNSF_1&cntn_id=304294&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

Link to press release: Lost birds and mammals spell doom for some plants

Animal-dispersed plants’ ability to keep pace with climate change reduced by 60%

Press Release, Rice University, Jan 13, 2022

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/939518

Link to paper: The effects of defaunation on plants’ capacity to track climate change

By Evan Frick, et al. AAAS Science, Jan 13, 2022

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk3510?adobe_mc=MCMID%3D17217070078390829693680401760040852165%7CMCORGID%3D242B6472541199F70A4C98A6%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1643060703&_ga=2.98067930.458000925.1643060703-1249691990.1642166285

The net-zero transition: What it would cost, what it could bring

Governments and companies worldwide are pledging to achieve net-zero emissions of greenhouse gases. What would it take to fulfill that ambition?

By Staff, McKinsey Sustainability, Accessed Jan 28, 2022 [H/t Bud Bromley]

https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/the-net-zero-transition-what-it-would-cost-what-it-could-bring#

[SEPP Comment: Bromley registered then wrote: “Is there a chemist or scientist in your organization? Did they have any input to this report? Is this reported anywhere?”

Questioning the Orthodoxy

I’m From The Government And I’m Here To Help

By Tony Heller, His Blog, Jan 27, 2022

https://realclimatescience.com/2022/01/im-from-the-government-and-im-here-to-help-5/

Video

Pavlov’s Humans

By Tony Heller, His Blog, Jan 28, 2022

https://realclimatescience.com/2022/01/pavlovs-humans/

Video

Change in US Administrations

Why Biden Can’t Put A Cap On Oil Prices

By Tsvetana Paraskova, Oil Price.com, Jan 23, 2022

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Why-Biden-Cant-Put-A-Cap-On-Oil-Prices.html

“The problem is, politicians have few tools to influence the oil market ruled by the laws of supply and demand.”

[SEPP Comment: No, the real problem is the ideological beliefs of the Biden Administration. It cannot recognize that, through competition, US domestic producers will put a price cap on oil. Instead, the Biden Administration is trying to cripple US production.]

Biden War on Energy Surrenders US Leverage Over Russia, China, Iran Threats

By Larry Bell, Newsmax, Jan 26, 2022

https://www.newsmax.com/larrybell/biden-energy-russia-china/2022/01/26/id/1054081/

New England Will Freeze If Sleepy Joe Gets His Green New Deal

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Jan 24, 2022



Source link

news7g

News7g: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button