Recent Goods for SpaceX’s Starlink and its role in helping Ukraine defend itself against a brutal Russian invasion seems only to become more urgent, especially as the Russian government ramps up attacks on its infrastructure. Ukraine’s civil service, targeting electricity, water and telecommunications. Starlink, an internet service powered by a vast “satellite constellation,” is the backing needed to combat that devastation. At the beginning of the Russian invasion, SpaceX sent thousands of its terminals to Ukraine to facilitate communication between the Ukrainian Armed Forces and help civilians communicate with the outside world, although it will be a while to claim donated terminals, like washington articles quickly discovered.
Since then, Starlink has also become an essential tool for the Ukrainian military to coordinate operations over thousands of kilometers. Michael Kofman, a defense analyst at CNA Corporation and an expert on the Russian military, doesn’t like deep or exaggerated statements, admitted in a recent interview: “At the beginning of the war, I was a bit dismissive of its effectiveness but I think it has grown considerably over time and I think it really has a really important role in what it offers people. Ukraine on the battlefield.”
But now, with power outages affecting the system and SpaceX’s last online CEO, Elon Musk, suggesting that his support for Ukraine’s position has waned, it may have been It’s time for Elon to demonstrate this important tool against Twitter-driven whims — and think critically about bringing more of the defense and space industries back into the direct line of government. Such critical infrastructure needs to be nationalized instead of being used as PR football for attention-seeking CEOs.
Ukraine should not depend on a system to be subject to one man’s notoriously ruthless whims. The role of tech companies – already notoriously uncountable – in such important causes is overwhelming here, and the world doesn’t need any more tech moguls who love “a prime mover”. their weird art” to end global crises. While public-private partnerships have been much mythologized, it’s time to consider re-nationalizing critical infrastructure, if only to protect them from the kind of silliness that CEOs love. on Twitter.
Understand what happened Over the past few weeks there should be a bit of granularity — although it’s worth noting that the date events were reported are not necessarily when they occurred.
Trouble broke out in public on October 3 when Musk tweeted about a widely mocked “peace plan” for Ukraine that would see it surrender much of the territory Russia annexed during the war, as well as Crimea, which was illegally annexed in 2014. He has doubled down on his plans in the coming days. Needless to say, the Ukrainians decided to be very cold to the idea; Ukrainian diplomat Andrij Melnyk even told Musk “Damned.”
In a seemingly unrelated event, on October 7, it was reported that Starlink terminals experienced a line-wide outage prior to the Ukrainian advance against Russian forces in the Donbas. and further south in Kherson.
However, the plot thickened, on October 11, as consultant Ian Bremmer alleges in his widely read geopolitical newsletter that Musk tweeted this indecent proposal after a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin himself, and that Musk told him a lot. Musk vehemently denied this and in the end, So is the Kremlin. afterward news reports that Musk’s SpaceX says the company cannot fund the use of Starlink terminals indefinitely or provide any further funds to Ukraine unless the US government takes over the program funding. from SpaceX.
