The NYT Column Praises Inflation for Its Ability to ‘Promote Pleasure Change for the Planet’ – ‘Adjust What We Eat to Save Both Our Pocketbooks and Our Planet’
[You vil eat the bugs peasant, you vil suffer and LIKE IT~cr]
Is economic chaos good?!
Marc Morano of Climate Depot: The New York Times seems to have wanted to update Gordon Gekko’s phrase from the 1987 film Wall Street: Chaos, for lack of a better word, is GOOD.
#
Culture & lifestyle journalist Annaliese Griffin writes in the New York Times: “Inflation has the potential to spur a welcome change for the planet if Americans think differently about the way they eat… We can adjust those what we eat to save both our pocket and the planet. ”
“Climate change has pushed some people to eat less meat to use more resources and more vegetables, grains and legumes, but the movement has not yet reached the scale necessary to bring about the change needed. – not yet… Ah Research in 2021 In nature, animal products produce greenhouse gases at twice the rate of plant foods. We should be paying attention to every ton of carbon dioxide that enters the atmosphere – the same way shoppers view the cost of each addition to their grocery cart. “…
“Inflation due to fuel and feed costs, coupled with supply chain slowdowns, could make meat alternatives more affordable than traditional home-grown meats.” machine. … Historically, cost has been a powerful driver that has changed the American diet.”
Via: Marc Morano
the @New York Times Forget that dying of starvation also reduces your carbon footprint. https://t.co/V8qiKRkJOh
– zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 5, 2022
Culture and lifestyle journalist Annaliese Griffin writes in the New York Times:
Annaliese Griffin NYT Quote: If current rates of food inflation hold and Americans don’t change their meat consumption habits, they will spend about $20 billion more on meat, poultry, fish, and eggs next year than they did in 2020. … Inflation has the potential to spur a welcome change for the planet if Americans think differently about the way they eat. While hunger and food insecurity are a very real problem in the United States and around the globe, middle- and upper-class Americans still have more grocery choices than anyone else. food buyers in history. Climate change has prompted some people to eat less meat to use more resources and more vegetables, grains and legumes, but the movement has not yet reached the scale needed to bring about the change needed. set.
…
A 2021 study in the journal Nature found that animal products produce greenhouse gases at twice the rate of plant foods. We should be paying attention to every ton of carbon dioxide that enters the atmosphere – the same way shoppers are looking at the cost of each addition to their grocery cart. …
A recent survey of 3,500 consumers found that while environmental and animal rights concerns won’t convince many to shop for meat alternatives more often, the prices are lower. can still happen.
…
Inflation due to fuel and feed costs, coupled with supply chain slowdowns, could make meat alternatives more affordable than traditional factory-raised meats. . … Historically, cost has been a powerful driver of change in the American diet. Yes, people in most cultures tend to eat more meat as they become richer. But tighter budgets also reduce meat consumption.
…
In 1917, a few months after the country entered World War I, Congress passed the Lever Food and Fuel Control Act, which gave the government the power to raid the food supply. Helen Zoe Veit, a history professor at Michigan State University, quotes a contemporary critic calling it the “most radical” bill ever enacted by Congress in her book Modern Food, Ethical Food. virtue”. The Leverage Act allows the government to requisition food and prevent hoarding. It also created the Food Administration, led by Herbert Hoover, more than a decade from his presidency, who asked Americans to commit to one wheat-free meal and one meal meat-free every day, plus a wheat-free Monday, a meat-free Tuesday, and a pork-free Saturday (the pleasant allusion to “meat-free Monday” obviously didn’t happen to him) .
The Leverage Act came into being at a time when the cost of living, including the price of food, had risen dramatically, by about a third between 1897 and 1916. Americans may have balked at the administration since Hoover’s top-down position – he is sometimes called a “food dictator” – but overall, they were determined to join the cause, especially since they were adept at practicing the art of frugality when related to food. Veit points to recipe books from the era that advertised eggless pies and meatless casseroles as a way to save money. There has been “a huge cultural uptake to the idea that in general, we can make small sacrifices – that is how people see giving up meat – and we will make sacrifices for a greater good and accomplish something”, Dr. Veit told me.
…
There is an inherent contradiction in asking people to change their most personal habits because of climate change when government policy places few restrictions on polluting industries such as oil and gas. , coal and automobiles. However, the answer is not – or; it is both-and. Rising prices of all consumer goods are putting pressure on Americans, but our food spending could be easier to modify than what we pay at the gas pump. We don’t have to become a nation of vegetarians overnight, but we can adjust what we eat to save both our pockets and the planet.
…
Annaliese Griffin (@annalieseg) is a journalist specializing in culture, lifestyle and health.
Related
