Shortly after the Canon EOS R5 was released, I received one from Canon for review. I liked this camera enough to gradually transition from the EOS 5D Mark IV. Now, after three years, I want to share my long experience and things that can or should improve in the next iteration.
For me, the most important benefit from Canon EOS R5 is the autofocus system. This is a huge step up from the system included in the EOS 5D Mark IV. It makes photographing weddings and people so much easier.
Since that time, I have used the EOS R5 extensively for photography and videography in various fields. I used this camera to evaluate new lenses, and I had the opportunity to compare it with newer EOS models released in later years.
Due to its direct comparison with newer EOS models, the EOS R5 feels less special over time. Today, innovation happens quickly and the smaller EOS models have proven to be better in a number of ways. That’s not to say the EOS R5 can no longer fulfill that task, but it did become an older mirrorless model sooner than expected.
The differences are mainly internal, but there are also some external differences. This is, of course, a logical evolution of camera models. Just as the EOS R5 and EOS R6 are improved models over the EOS R and EOS RP, the newer mirrorless models are designed with an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of their predecessors, the EOS R5 and EOS R6.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m still satisfied with the Canon EOS R5 and the images it produces are great. The resolution is probably a bit too much for most cases, but I wouldn’t complain there. The camera is comfortable in the hand and I like the viewfinder and LCD screen. The menu is easy to use and the touchscreen functionality works like a charm.
What can or should be improved?
When it comes to design, there are a few things I don’t really like. It is not something to upset, but to improve. At first, I liked the small LCD screen on top, but I don’t use it as often as I would like. Sometimes, I glance at it, look at the ISO or the aperture, but that’s all. Turns out I prefer the dial instead of the Mode button to choose different exposure modes.
The LCD screen is the cause of the absence of the PSAM dial, although there is enough space on the left shoulder for that dial. It’s a pity that Canon chose to use the left shoulder for the main power switch. Why not put the PSAM dial on that spot?
I also miss a custom button on the front of the camera. It has a DOF button, but I would like an extra button or two like on the EOS R3. Speaking of the DOF button, I’d also like to have an AF/MF toggle with one of those buttons. It would be a great addition.
On the back of the camera there isn’t much that needs to be improved for me. A sensor in the AF-ON button would be great, same as above EOS R3 And EOS 1D X Mark III. If I could grant one wish, an articulated screen like the one found on Sony a7R DRAW would be great, especially when I use the L bracket.
If Canon made these physical improvements to the mark II model, it would be another leap forward for a true professional camera. But there is much more. Better battery life is another wish, like the full-size HDMI connector.
Improvements to Menu Options and Functions
One thing that bothers me a lot is the limitations of some menu options. A lot can be improved on the EOS R5 with a firmware update and I hope Canon decides to do so. But I think it’s wishful thinking. The latest upgrade has given a useless high resolution moderather an upgrade to the autofocus system and customization options.
Improved user-defined AF areas, tracking and eye AF, more options for customizing buttons, and expanded dial functions. That would be a huge improvement and get the EOS R5 up to date again.
Other options that will improve the user experience are zebras for photography and false color overlays for movies, perhaps a menu entirely dedicated to all movies, as in Canon EOS R5C. Removing the recording limit would also be a good thing.
This list of changes and improvements sounds like a lot, but it’s not. These changes, on the outside as well as the inside, will make the new mark II version of the EOS R5 stand out from all the other EOS cameras available. It should make a difference between the EOS R3 and the smaller EOS R5C, but not by much.
I want an update for Canon EOS R5
I enjoyed using my Canon EOS R5, even after three years of intensive use, even after using and evaluating many other cameras from Canon, as well as Nikon and Sony. I’ve never felt the need to switch completely to another brand and still have no reason to do so. Modern cameras are becoming more similar with each new model. The difference is in the details.
If I wanted to add a few more functions to my Canon EOS R5, I only think of two things. The first is the ability to use a Bulb timer along with an interval setting. The other is a function called Live Bulb. This is a function currently limited to Olympus cameras. Wouldn’t it be great if this was added to the menu? I think it’s worth far more than the crippled high resolution option Canon gives us. Wouldn’t you agree?
What improvements would you like to have next time Canon EOS R5, which is perhaps the Mark II model? Please share your wishes in the comments section below and let’s hope Canon takes notice.
