Soros Funds Behind Off-Books Congressional “Staff” to Investigate Political Opponents on Climate Agenda – Are You Happy With That?

From government accountability and oversight

WEBPAGE

Follow on this stories and related complain pay with congressional ethics oversight offices, courtesy of the intrepid Hayden Ludwig of the Center for Capital Studies We now see that the money behind the privately funded congressional coroners comes from none other than George Soros’s Open Society projects.

Specifically, it looks like $300,000 Go from c4 of Soros (Open Society Policy Institute) to 1630 Fund for Co-Equal Action, with grant card, “supporting work to improve efficiency and oversight of Congress”.

Another $282,2000 went to support Hill with permission from “eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s The Voice of the Democracy Foundation in 2019 to ‘provide information and advice to help members of Congress develop policy and conduct effective oversight.’

As we know, thanks to two ethics complaints and yesterday’s public access lawsuit to the records against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, et al., that means provide off-the-book congressional investigators to enhance professional staffing, improperly for any Member or office to join, pursue private parties, political opponents.

It’s a donor to hang for Members who violate not only House Rules but also federal law, if they take the bait. The Chairman of the House Oversight Subcommittee Ro Khanna made a confession. As all presented in those complaints. One of those recipients, the House Inspector General, immediately wave goodbye like it’s not his job. Though it seems pretty obvious in the scope of his House resource management investigation.

Democracy dies in the shadow of money, etc. Note that this money comes from Arabella’s c4 patron group – a hardline core political organization, not some “charity” or educational establishment Public education is considered nonpartisan. For a series of citations and critiques of WaPo’s 1630 c4 Foundation, Politico et al. see compilation of CRC hereSo we now know that partisan funding of prosecutorial or quasi-judicial activities goes beyond just Soros prosecutors, superiors and legal counsel, or Michael Bloomberg’s plan Operational prosecutors are hired separately to pursue their own agenda through the state attorney general’s office. much more gray area. It extends to off-the-books congressional staff who exhibit facial violations (of the Participating Members) of House Rules and federal law.

This activity – hidden in plain sight thanks to the New York Times the demo was so clumsy that it never considered the correctness or even legitimacy of what it confessed to be revolutionary, a “unconventional approach” currently being tried. to explicitly react to the election of President Donald Trump – is a pulse-testing step for the institution of journalism. But, even though it’s the people we like, the motivating idea that we agree with? It represented a test of principle for the Republican congressional minority, “Dark Money” berating Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and any elected Democrat looking to show off their rhetoric about Good governance remotely is sincere.