Weather

Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #540


The Week That Was: 2023-02-11 (February 11, 2023)
Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org)
The Science and Environmental Policy Project

Quote of the Week: “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” – Albert Einstein

Number of the Week: 10%

THIS WEEK:

By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)

Scope: The issues addressed this week include the following: In its latest Summary for Policymakers (2021) the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has attempted to suppress natural variation from any discussions on climate change over the last 2000 years. Ecologist Jim Steele continues to try to provide a better understanding of natural climate change. In the latest presentation he discusses the dynamics of Arctic sea ice and how the emphasis on surface air temperatures hides important features of climate dynamics.

Roy Spencer continues with the second part of his efforts to estimate an influence of urbanization on land temperature-monitoring stations used in the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). Using Landsat-based data he develops an average change over 40 years (1975 to 2014) for 19,885 GHCN stations from 20N to 82.5N latitude.

Judith Curry was interviewed by Jordan Peterson. She reported on the interview but did not comment on the contents. In hopes that the text will be posted, TWTW will delay comments. It recognizes that Curry’s views on climate modeling may differ from those expressed in TWTW. See links under Seeking a Common Ground.

Planning engineer Russell Schussler and New York energy commentator Roger Caiazza present traditional planning for new generation and explore characteristics for a good path moving towards Net Zero emissions of carbon dioxide in the generation of electricity. Many politicians have embraced shutting down electricity generation using fossil fuels but have not carefully considered what is available to replace them. Can the replacements provide reliable, affordable electricity?

Manhattan attorney Francis Menton continues his call for a demonstration project to be used to calculate the real costs of providing electricity through wind and solar generation plus the necessary storage.

Jennifer Marohasy continues her efforts to obtain the records of a weather station in Australia where both thermometer probes and mercury-based thermometers were used simultaneously. Such records are needed to establish a period of standardization showing both types of instruments measure the same thing the same way.

Energy professional Donn Dears begins a series to discussed materials needed to convert the automobile industry to 100% battery powered vehicles. He begins with a material that is seldom discussed – graphite.

This week, the US military shooting down weather balloons became a news fad. Weather balloons are extremely important in weather forecasting and in obtaining information needed for modern atmospheric science (rather than speculation). For example, the HITRAN database used by William van Wijngaarden and William Happer is based on laboratory measurements under ideal conditions. Pressure and temperature, however, modify the cross-sections in calculable ways. The weather balloons give them the data they need to make the corrections. Cliff Mass explains the instruments on board and the wind currents that can be used to track the path of weather balloons.

******************

Changing Arctic Ice: Few acts better exemplify the disregard the IPCC and its authors have for scientific integrity than the sudden inclusion in the Summary for Policymakers (SPM, AR6, 2021) of a two-thousand-year hockey-stick (Figure SPM.1) under the heading “Human influence warmed the climate at a rate that is unprecedented in at least the last 2000 years.” The graph even shows the recent warming greater than the “Warmest multi-century period in more than 100,000 years.” Not stated is that the reconstruction is made of tiny bits and pieces of proxy data, not standardized, or calibrated to ensure they measure the same thing. It is like calling furniture made of sawdust and glue with a thin veneer solid wood. In a long series of posts, discussed in past TWTWs, Stephen McIntyre has demolished this false “hockey-stick..”

In a clear video with text, Jim Steele discusses the Atlantic Multidecadal Variability or Multidecadal Oscillation which represents 20 plus years of warmer temperatures in the north Atlantic than the south, then reversing. He concludes:

“This oscillation is intimately linked to variability of the surface currents in the Atlantic’s surface Meridional Overturning circulation within the Ocean Conveyor Belt.

“First detected in the 1980s and officially named around 2000, the positive phase represents a warmer north Atlantic that is linked to several climate dynamics. From the 1930s to 60s and then 1990s to present, the positive warm phases were associated with less Arctic sea ice, increased Sahel rainfall, increased hurricane activity, and frequent heat extremes in the southwestern USA.

“The negative phase from the 1960s to 1990 …, saw a reversal of those dynamics as Arctic sea ice rebounded from its 1930s low extent. Accordingly, a 40-year research project over the Arctic ocean during a cool phase and published in 1993 determined there was an “absence of evidence for greenhouse warming” over the Arctic ocean.”

To build to this conclusion, Steele starts:

However, a dubious narrative uncritically attributes rising CO2 to those [Arctic temperature] anomalies, then speculates about a future warming crisis while ignoring important natural dynamics such as ocean currents.

But there is a wealth of scientific research that has shown ocean currents can also cause those higher temperature anomalies, but that isn’t obvious from this anomaly illustration. To add to the misunderstanding, the high Arctic temperatures are paradoxically due to heat ventilating out from the ocean and cooling the earth, thus actually preventing future extreme warming.

The warm 2016 winter temperatures in the eastern tropical Pacific were caused by a natural El Nino event that also ventilated heat previously stored in the western Pacific, briefly warming the air but again actually cooling the earth.

El Nino events also contribute to warmer sea surface temperatures simply by reducing the trade winds that drive upwelling of cold subsurface water. Such warming when upwelling is inhibited is observed globally. For example, a 3-month study showed how monthly changes in wind direction … caused a 6 to 8C (11-14F) surface temperature change.

Along the coast of Oregon, when winds blow in a southward direction, upwelling is enhanced, and surface temperatures fall …

Conversely, when winds blow to the north upwelling of cooler deeper water is inhibited causing temperatures to rise by 6-8C (11-14F).

Such dramatic natural temperature changes have nothing to do with radiative heating from the sun or greenhouse gases. Nonetheless warmer temperatures from reduced upwelling are often mistakenly incorporated into the global average temperature as seen during El Nino events and then attributed to CO2 warming.

It is far more insightful to understand climate change by looking at actual temperature changes. Using publicly available national weather service data, a quick survey of subarctic temperatures on January 29th, 2023, at 60 degrees latitude just south of the Arctic Circle, reveals how ocean currents alone cause tremendous temperature differences.

Steele shows that temperatures varied significantly on that date. He further states:

“Even though all measurements were taken at the same latitude, on the same date and same time, there is a huge 40C or 73F temperature difference between the Hudson Bay and Norwegian coast.

“Indisputably, that variability is caused by heat transported northward by ocean currents and ventilated to the Arctic atmosphere. It is the ocean currents that are the Arctic’s climate ‘control knob,’ not atmospheric greenhouse warming, as witnessed by the extremely cold Hudson Bay.”

Steele gives maps showing the various currents in the North Atlantic and the Arctic and asserts that carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are poorly correlated with the extent of Arctic winter sea ice. He discusses the frequently ignored deep basins in the Arctic Ocean that hold the warm and cool waters for up to two to three decades.

He then goes into the perplexing problem of the Younger Dryas, a sudden cooling lasting about 1300 years followed by a sudden warming, between roughly 12900 and 11600 years ago, which CO2 concentrations cannot explain. Steele suggests:

“Natural dynamics affect the flow of heat in the Atlantic segment of the Ocean Conveyor Belt. One dynamic is the location of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (or ITCZ) which caused a dramatic temperature effect at the end of the last ice age.

“Ice core data show temperatures that had been rapidly warming suddenly dropped by 20C or 36F in the northern hemisphere for about a thousand years during a cold period called the Younger Dryas (YD). In contrast, southern hemisphere temperatures slightly warmed.

“Proxy data suggests the westward trade winds and ITCZ had shifted southward causing the warm South Equatorial Current (SEC) to also shift southward. Brazil’s eastern most land, Ponta do Seixas amplified that shift by deflecting more warm water back into the south Atlantic and thus cooling the north Atlantic.

“The warmer 10,000 years of the Holocene period correlates with the ITCZ shifting northward, causing the warm South Equatorial Current to deliver more warm water across the equator, to warm the north Atlantic while cooling the south.

“A similar but smaller southward shift of the ITCZ corresponds with the Little Ice Age which mostly cooled the northern Atlantic regions. The Little Ice Age ended around 1850 as the ITCZ moved northward for our most recent 150 years.”

Steele does not discuss it but his discussion of changes in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) may apply to the well-recognized Dansgaard-Oeschger events (D-O events). These are periods of rapid warming followed by slow cooling lasting about 1500 years. These have been observed in ice cores taken in Greenland and elsewhere in the North Atlantic and to a lesser extent in glaciers in South America and Antarctica. See links under Challenging the Orthodoxy, Defending the Orthodoxy, https://climateaudit.org, and Unstoppable Global Warming by Singer and Avery https://www.amazon.com/Unstoppable-Global-Warming-Updated-Expanded/dp/0742551245

******************

How Biased? John Christy and Roy Spencer have been examining the effects of urban heat island effects (UHI) on GHCN stations to try to estimate the influence of urbanization on reported temperature trends, which are used by government entities to monitor global warming and are used in global climate models. Spencer reports that none of the 19,885 GHCN stations experienced negative growth. Using 21×21 km grids and Landsat-based urbanization values (which he terms BU). He writes:

While we all know that urban areas are warmer than rural areas, especially at night and during the summer, does an increase in urbanization lead to spurious warming at the GHCN stations that experienced growth (which is the majority of them)?

And, even if it did, does the homogenization procedure NOAA uses to correct for spurious temperature effects remove (even partially) urban heat island (UHI) effects on reported temperature trends? [Italics in original]

“John Christy and I have been examining these questions by comparing the GHCN temperature dataset (both unadjusted and adjusted [homogenized] versions) to these Landsat-based measurements of human settlement structures, which I will just call “urbanization”.

“Here’s what I’m finding so far.

“The Strongest UHI Warming with Urbanization Growth Occurs at Nearly-Rural Stations [Boldface in original.]

“…the urban heat island effect is strongly nonlinear, with (for example) a 2% increase in urbanization at rural sites producing much more warming than a 2% increase at an urban site. This means that a climate monitoring dataset using mostly-rural stations is not immune from spurious warming from creeping urbanization, unless there has been absolutely zero growth. [Italics in original]

Spencer develops a simple model to estimate seasonal average of UHI and finds that adjustments by NOAA on the temperature trends for urbanization increase, not decrease, warming trends. He writes:

“Thus, it appears that NOAA’s homogenization procedure is spuriously warming station temperature trends (on average) when it should be cooling them. I don’t know how to conclude any different.

“Why are the NOAA adjustments going in the wrong direction? I don’t know.

“To say the least, I find these results… curious.

“OK, so how big is this spurious warming effect on land temperature trends in the GHCN dataset? [Boldface in original]

“Before you jump to the conclusion that GHCN temperature trends have too much spurious warming to be relied upon for monitoring global warming, what I have shown does not tell us by just how much the land-average temperature trends are biased upward. I will address that in Part III.

“My very preliminary calculations so far (using the UHI curves in Fig. 4 applied to the 21×21 km urbanization growth curve in Fig. 2) [Figures not shown here] suggest the UHI warming averaged over all stations is about 10-20% of the GHCN trends. Small, but not insignificant. But that could change as I dig deeper into the issue.”

See link under Challenging the Orthodoxy.

******************

Good or Bad Plans: In a long post discussing plans by government entities, including New York State, Russell Schussler and Roger Caiazza bring out the difference of good and bad plans for utilities to be able to develop electrical generation plans which need a planning horizon of about 30 years. Schussler and Caiazza write:

“Bad plans assume that critical elements of the future are all known. Bad plans are narrowly constructed to a specified future. They risk not allowing the flexibility to adapt when things turn out differently than planned. Good plans look at their impacts or current decisions across a wide variety of potential futures. Good plans provide flexibility and nimbleness for when future conditions change.”

“Good generation plans recognize how people prefer to use electricity. If behavior needs to be changed, they are sensitive to the capabilities and limits of incentives. Depending on the generation mix the value of electricity will likely vary considerably across hours, days, months, and seasons. Good plans will seek to provide value. Bad plans tend not to differentiate between when and how energy might be supplied. Plans crafted based on just average use and average costs will likely not have good results. Traditionally generation planning recognized baseload, intermediate and peaking needs. While many seem to forget these distinctions when comparing alternatives, their importance has not diminished.”

“Good plans look at major environmental impacts across the production and lifetime of a resource. Bad plans tend to look only at marginal impacts when the facilities are operating. Tremendous resources and costs are incurred just getting a generating resource in place. Generally, the longer that resource can operate, the better its average environmental impact might be. Good plans should consider the realistic lifetime of potential resource. Many “green” resources projected to last 30 years fall far shy of 20 years. Conventional resources typically are capable of lasting many years beyond the thirty-year study life.”

“Good plans rely on proven technology that can fulfill the specific requirements. For example, providing power for periods of peak load is required for reliable power when it is needed most. Peak loads are typically associated with the hottest and coldest periods of the year when electricity is used for cooling and heating. Typically, those periods occur less than 5% of the time so a technology should be as low cost as possible to keep the price of electricity down during peak loads. A good plan would make the sensible decision to keep an old fossil fired plant around to help the system meet peak loads. Fossil-fired steam boiler electric generating units are a proven technology that can be used to meet this need.”

“Bad plans presume that a new technology can fulfill specific needs. A necessary component of any future system is dependable emergency capacity. For example, a system might need emergency capacity once every five years due to extreme weather either causing very high loads, an unexpected long-term outage of existing resources, or because of an extended drought of wind and solar resources. A bad plan proposes a new technology for this emergency requirement. In order to provide capacity in a zero-emissions electric system a new category of generating resources called Dispatchable Emissions-Free Resources (DEFR) has been suggested to keep the lights on during periods of extended low wind and solar resource availability.”

They evaluate the New York State plan and find it wanting. Among other things the Dispatchable Emissions-Free Resources (DEFR) is “green hydrogen” which is, thus far, a fantasy. The authors propose a compromise plan. See link under Challenging the Orthodoxy.

******************

A Demonstration Project? In demanding a demonstration project for a grid based on renewables and storage Francis Menton discusses the skyrocketing costs of electricity in Germany, the UK and California. He writes:

“It doesn’t take a genius to figure out why the costs explode. They can build thousands of wind turbines and solar panels, but they can’t get rid of any of the dispatchable power plants because they are all needed for backup. So now they are paying for two duplicative systems.  Then they must pay the dispatchable plants enough to cover their capital costs at half time usage. Then they must buy the fossil fuels for backup on spot markets where production has been suppressed by, for example, banning fracking.”

As Menton explains, many politicians and academic “experts” ignore such details. Menton concludes:

“Nobody would be happier than me to see a demonstration project built that showed that wind and solar could provide reliable electricity at low cost. Unfortunately, I know too much about the subject to think that that is likely, or even remotely possible. But at least the rest of us need to demand a demonstration project from the promoters of these fantasies.”

See link under Challenging the Orthodoxy.

******************

Mysterious Vanishing? Jennifer Marohasy continues her search for records from mercury thermometers and platinum resistance probes in Mildura for September 23, 2017 – “the hottest day ever recorded.” This was branded the hottest day in Australia’s history and Mildura had both types of records. She has discovered that there are no parallel records for that day. She has received over 10,000 scanned pages from January 1, 1989, to January 31, 2015, with every day in the hot month of September 2012 missing. Marohasy draws no conclusions. See link under Measurement Issues – Surface

******************

I Pencil: Donn Dears begins a series to discussed materials needed to convert the automobile industry to 100% battery powered vehicles with a discussion of graphite. According to Dears:

“If every car sold in the US in 2019, the year before the pandemic, had been a battery-powered vehicle, the US would have used 1.12 million tons of graphite. More than the world consumed in 2021.”

Given that mining permits are virtually impossible to obtain in the US and Washington is denying development of Federal lands, the US automobile industry would need to import graphite from other countries such as China. See link under Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Vehicles and Article #1

******************

Riding the Winds: Weather balloons are very much in the news. Cliff Mass has two posts discussing the instruments on board a typical weather balloon and how balloons can be used to take advantage of different winds at different altitudes to be guided to a particular area or region. See links under Other Scientific News.

******************

Beyond Groupthink: The 15th Climate Change Conference by The Heartland Institute will be held from February 23 to 25, 2023, at the Hilton Lake Buena Vista in Orlando, Florida. It will feature over 40 speakers, including members of the SEPP Board of Directors, Willie Soon and David Legates. Tom Sheahen, Howard “Cork” Hayden, and Ken Haapala will address the question: “Is Climate Science Scientific?”

Mathematician and Physicist Christopher Essex will receive SEPP’s 2022 Fredrick Seitz Memorial Award. Other featured speakers include Richard Lindzen, William Happer, Ross McKitrick, who exposed the improper use of the Gauss-Markov Theorem in CO2 attribution studies, Ian Plimer, Patrick Moore, Anthony Watts, Joe Bastardi, and many more. See https://climateconference.heartland.org/

****************

Number of the Week: 10% Paul Homewood reports that the BP Energy Review, 2023, shows that despite extensive fanfare over the past several decades wind and solar power only make up about 10% of world electricity generation and since 2010 there has been a bigger world-wide increase in fossil fuel electricity generation than in solar and wind generation. Coal is # 1 and growing; Gas is # 2 and growing. TWTW confirmed these statistics with energdata.net and statista.com See link under Communicating Better to the Public – Use Yellow (Green) Journalism?

Censorship

Censoring Inconvenient Truths

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Feb 10, 2023

news7g

News7g: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button