On November 11, 2021, a protest was established outside Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia (BC). The group is there to call attention to an unthinkable tragedy: 13 infants presumed to be stillborn in hospital over a 24-hour period. All of their mothers were vaccinated with COVID-19.first
One of the opponents said that in a typical month there can be one stillbirth in the hospital, making 13 stillbirths very unusual. The only reason the deaths come to light is because some doulas appear, detailing the events.
Vancouver Coastal Health has denied reports of stillbirths at Lions Gate Hospital, saying “There is no truth to this claim… There has been no notable change in stillbirth rates in the area. VCH sector during the COVID-19 pandemic.”2
However, after speaking with police outside the hospital, Dr Daniel Nagase and Dr Mel Bruchet began a formal investigation, and Nagase filed a formal complaint with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police against executives at the BC College of Physicians & Surgeons, alleging conflicts of interest influence their policies, decisions and statements to the people of British Columbia.3
If any executive holds a stock, bond or mutual fund, whose value increases as pharmaceutical sales increase, that’s a conflict of interest that should have been declared, Nagase said. dad. The implication is that it could also affect their ability to further investigate the unusual number of stillbirths occurring in hospitals, particularly in relation to the COVID-19 nebulizer their mothers received.
Spike in infant death in Scotland
Scotland has also experienced an unusual increase in infant mortality. In September 2021, at least 21 infants under 4 weeks of age died – a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births. The average infant mortality rate in Scotland is around 2 per 1,000 births.4
Public Health Scotland (PHS), which is investigating the deaths, said, “Beyond the upper control limit suggests that it is more likely that there are factors beyond the possible random variation. contributed to the number of deaths,” adding that there is “currently no indication of a link between these deaths and Covid-19 infections.”5
It is not clear whether the injection of COVID-19 in pregnant women would be assessed as a contributing factor or a cause, although it absolutely should.
PHS only said it was working with the Scottish National Neonatal Network, the Maternity and Child Quality Improvement Collaborative and the Scottish Government “to understand any factors that may be contributing to the patterns.” most recent infant mortality and incorporate the findings into existing prevention and improvement work.”6
Fetal deaths, stillbirths soar among vaccinated women
As of November 12, 2021, there were 2,620 stillbirths or stillbirths among women vaccinated with COVID-19 reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).7 Health Impact News ran the same search for VAERS, but this time excluding COVID-19 shots – to look for fetal deaths in women who had received any other vaccine than the shot. COVID-19 over the past 30 years. They found:8
“We are currently recording an annual total of 2,838 fetal deaths recorded after vaccination against COVID-19, while the average annual number of fetal deaths recorded after vaccination for pregnant women over the past 30 years is an average of 74 fetal deaths per year.”
Health officials are adamant that pregnant women get the COVID-19 shot, but the data doesn’t support its safety. Research funded by CDC9 published in the widely used New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in support of the US recommendation for the injection of the drug in pregnant women was corrected October 2021, with correction to be:ten
“In the table’s caption, the following should have been added to the double dagger’s caption:
“There is no denominator to calculate the risk estimate for spontaneous abortion, because at the time of this report, 905 of the 1224 participants had been vaccinated within the 30 days prior to the first day of pregnancy.” of the last menstrual period has no denominator” during menstruation or during the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate needs to take into account the week-specific risk of spontaneous abortion. “
Data used to support COVID-19 Captured in pregnant women with stamp removed
In a quick exchange from the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), Aleisha Brock, Ph.D. of New Zealand, and Simon Thornley, PhD, senior lecturer in epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Auckland, explain that the NEJM study “represents misleading statistics regarding the risk of miscarriage natural pregnancy during early pregnancy, as the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was determined (20 weeks gestational age).”11
When the risk of spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage, was recalculated based on the cohort injected 20 weeks before pregnancy, the rate of miscarriage was 7 to 8 times higher than the original study showed. , with cumulative miscarriage rates ranging from 82% to 91%. According to the IPAK report:twelfth
“Research indicates that at least 81.9% (≥ 104/127) spontaneous abortions after exposure to mRNA before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) spontaneous abortions occur before This is a very high rate of Pregnancy Loss observed in those exposed to the mRNA vaccine before 20 weeks of pregnancy, ranging from 81.9–91.2%…
The authors’ interpretation of the observed rate of miscarriage in those who received the first mRNA vaccine before 20 weeks of gestation compared with baseline should be questioned.
Based on these findings, important policy decisions were made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data regarding the safety of women during early pregnancy exposure to mRNA-based vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19 are not valid. basis and recommend reconsideration of those policy decisions. “
Call for instant mRNA withdrawal
Not only did IPAK data show that COVID-19 injection before 20 weeks is unsafe for pregnant women, but 12.6% of women who received the injection during the 3rd trimester reported Grade 3 adverse events, serious or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening. . Another 8% also reported having a fever of 38 degrees Celsius (100.4 degrees Fahrenheit), which can lead to miscarriage or premature birth.13
Furthermore, study follow-up only continued for 28 days after birth, meaning that the long-term effects of prenatal exposure on infants are still unknown. The many concerns with injecting COVID-19 mRNA during pregnancy and lactation include the transfer of mutant mRNA and protein across the placenta and through breast milk, as well as inhibition of synctyin-1, a protein essential for normal growth and development. cell fusion and placental development.
Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials of injecting mRNA, but a study in Pfizer-BioNTech rats found that the injection doubled the pre-implantation rate of tooth loss and also resulted in a lower incidence of mouth/jaw malformations, gastroparesis (a birth defect of the abdomen and septum) and abnormalities of the right aortic arch and cervical vertebrae in the fetus.14
Together, IPAK believes the data are compelling enough to withdraw vaccinations for vulnerable populations. Noting their advice in bold, they said:15
“Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest immediate discontinuation of mRNA vaccines during pregnancy (Group X) and those who are breastfeeding, along with discontinuation of mRNA vaccines for children or persons of childbearing age in the population Generally speaking”
Vaccine researcher: Menstrual changes associated with vaccination
Women across the United States have reported changes in their menstrual cycles after getting a COVID-19 shot. Changes include heavier, earlier and more painful periods,16 as well as sudden, unexpected bleeding or spotting in women who use long-term birth control or who are postmenopausal and have not had a period for years or even decades.17 Health officials tried to dismiss the reports, but they became too many to ignore.
Gunnveig Grødeland, a Norwegian vaccine researcher at the University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, told TV2.no, “There are enough women who are going through changes, not just in Norway, but overseas, to make it possible to be connected to vaccines.”18,19
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) is currently studying menstrual bleeding in 60,000 Norwegian women aged 11 to 80 to find out if abnormalities are linked to COVID-19 injections. .
“We cannot rule out that there is a link between these menstrual abnormalities and the vaccine. We take these reports seriously and are doing a thorough job studying these possible correlation,” Lill Trogstad with NIPH told TV2.no.20
Kate Clancy, a human reproductive ecologist and associate professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and Katharine Lee, a biological anthropologist studying women’s health at the University of Washington School of Medicine in St. Louis, there are also more than 140,000 reports from those people. people who had changes in their periods after a COVID-19 shot, which they formally documented in an open study.21
Another 30,000 reports of period change after the collision were reported to the UK regulator.22 The implication was that the shots could affect fertility, but officials were quick to deny such a link.
However, in an editorial published in the BMJ, Victoria Male, a lecturer in reproductive immunology at Imperial College London, stated that when it comes to menstrual changes after a COVID-19 shot, ” a connection is legitimate and should be investigated.”23 According to Nam:24
“Menstrual changes have been reported after both the mRNA and adenovirus vector covid-19 vaccines, suggesting that, if there is a link, it is likely the result of an immune response to the vaccine.” vaccine rather than a specific vaccine component (HPV) has also been linked to menstrual variability.
… Biologically plausible mechanisms linking immune stimulation to menstrual changes include immune effects on hormones that promote the menstrual cycle or mediated effects of immune cells in the mucosa endometrium, which is involved in the cyclic formation and breakdown of this tissue. Research exploring a possible link between the covid-19 vaccine and menstrual changes may also help understand this mechanism. “
You cannot make informed decisions without facts
At this point, women are not warned that potential risks to miscarriage, menstrual irregularities, and even fertility have been discovered. But this is an urgent matter that needs to be investigated so that people can make an informed decision before agreeing to an injection that could seriously affect fertility.
However, it should be widely known that Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, a prominent toxicologist and molecular biologist working with the MD Anderson-Houston Cancer Center, spoke at the meeting of the MD Anderson-Houston Cancer Center. CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on April 23, 2021.
The focus of the meeting was on coagulation disorders following a COVID-19 injection, and Lindsay spoke during public comment, calling for “all gene therapy vaccines” to be “immediately halted due to safety concerns on several fronts”, including fertility.25 Lindsay warns that there are serious red flags that an entire generation could be at risk of sterilization if COVID-19 shots are not stopped until further research is conducted:26
“We simply cannot put these [vaccines] in our children, who have a 0.002% risk of dying from Covid, if infected, or any other group of childbearing age that has not explored this thoroughly. [If we do], we can sterilize an entire generation. Speculation is that this will not happen and the few anecdotal reports of pregnancy in the trial do not provide sufficient evidence that this does not affect the population at large. “
