With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents, released on April 1, 2022, old doubts have gained new support. As reported by cohost Kim Iversen “Rising” (video above), the first revelation was that natural immunity worked, and Pfizer knew it.
Clinical trial data showed no difference in outcomes between people who were previously infected with COVID and those who were vaccinated. None of the groups had severe infections. Natural immunity is also statistically similar to vaccination in terms of infection risk.
Younger people are more likely to experience side effects
The second revelation was that side effects from these shots were more severe in younger people, ages 18 to 55, than in people 55 and older. (The risk of side effects is also increased with additional doses, so the risk after the second dose is higher than the first.)
As many of us have said above, the risk of severe COVID-19 is significantly lower in people younger than those over 60, which makes the increased risk of side effects unacceptable.
As noted by The Naked Emperor on Substack,first “Given a vaccine that is producing more frequent and severe reactions and adverse events in younger people, this vaccine should be restricted to people who are actually at risk of COVID.” -19 serious.”
Pfizer literature shows high rates of myocarditis
Interestingly, the Pfizer document also includes medical information that the mainstream media and fact-checkers have labeled as misinformation or misinformation. The pediatric consent form lists a number of possible side effects, including a rate of myocarditis of 10 per 100,000 – much higher than the 1 in 50,000 (i.e. 2 in 100,000) rate reported. previously reported.
We also know that myocarditis occurs more often in young men, so for them the risk is significantly higher than 10 per 100,000, because they account for the majority of these injuries.
Reproductive health effects unknown
The consent form also states that the effect on sperm, fetus and nursing infant is unknown. However, the health authorities and the media have proven “truth” that this injection does not affect reproductive health or fertility and is completely safe for pregnant mothers and Breastfeeding.
If an effect is unknown, by definition you cannot claim it is harmless. If you do, you are lying, plain and simple, and the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, but one of a long list of people guilty of this. She has repeatedly assured the public that the stabbing poses no danger to the health of pregnant women or their unborn babies. Here’s Walensky in May 2021:
And here she is, in October 2021, still insisting there is no risk.
Similarly, in August 2021, when Comirnaty was licensed, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, declared the COVID spray to be safe during pregnancy:
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also makes definitive statements about safety, stating, “Vaccination can occur in any three months, and emphasis should be placed on getting the vaccine as much as possible. as early as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health.”2 However, even the label Comirnaty3,4 states that “the available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform the risks associated with the vaccine during pregnancy.”
Antibody-dependent enhancement has not been eliminated
Many people have warned about the possibility of mRNA injections causing antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) – a situation where you will end up being more susceptible to serious infections than you are used to – has been smeared and demonized by the media and labeled as spreader misinformation.
However, Pfizer’s own consent form states: “Although it has not been seen to date, it cannot be ruled out that the vaccine studied may cause later worsening of COVID-19 disease. .” As Iversen noted, if the ADE is really nothing to worry about, the consent form won’t include it. However, it is still there.
Vaccine-Associated Elevated Disease (VAED) is also listed as a “Potential Potentially Important Risk” in Table 5 on page 11 of the document titled “5.3.6 Cumulative analysis of adverse event reports” after being licensed”.5
As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, of which 75 were severe requiring hospitalization, disability, life-threatening or death; a total of 38 potentially fatal cases and 65 remain unresolved.6,7
Furthermore, as noted by the Daily Expose,8 “Phase 3 clinical trials are designed to detect frequent or severe side effects before vaccines are approved for use, including ADE. But here the problem lies, [because] No COVID-19 vaccine has completed Phase 3 trials.”
Pfizer Phase 3 testing will be completed on February 8, 20249 – almost two years from now! Even so, Pfizer concluded in the FDA’s submission that “none of the 75 cases could be considered VAED.”
“[H]My god they may not conclude definitively that VAED is to blame as 75% of the confirmed ‘barrier’ cases reported to them are serious illness leading to hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences are death? “ The Daily Expose asked the question.ten
Pfizer knew about immunosuppression
Another disclosure statement found in the documents was:
“Clinical laboratory evaluation showed that a transient decrease in lymphocytes was observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week…”
In other words, Pfizer knows that, during the first week after the injection, people of all ages experience transient immunosuppression, or, in other words, a temporary weakening of the immune system after the first dose.
As noted by Iversen, this can skew infection rates, as people are not considered partially vaccinated until 14 days after their first injection,11 and officially fully vaccinated two weeks after the second dose.
If people are susceptible to infection during that first week but are still considered unvaccinated during that time, this makes it appear that unvaccinated people are more susceptible to infection when it is simply incorrect. Pfizer’s own trial found that infections were significantly more common in the vaccine group than in the placebo group – 409 versus 287 – within the first seven days after injection.twelfth
Vaxxed is more likely to die from COVID
The fact that Pfizer and the US Food and Drug Administration were aware injections of immunosuppressive vaccines are being charged, now UK government data shows that, compared with those who have not been vaccinated prevention, those who received two doses were:13
- Three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
- More than twice as likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
- Three times more likely to die from COVID-19
The Pfizer documents acknowledge a temporary decline in immune function after the first dose, but the actual data showing an increased risk of severe infection and death from COVID among those who received the double shot show that ADE can actually happen later. .
The chart below, created by Daily Expose,14 using data from the UKHSA Vaccine Monitoring Report for week 13, 202215 (pages 40 and 45), revealing who is more likely to get COVID. And the infection rate for triple vaxxed is even higher than for dual vaxxed.
Next chart created by Daily Expose16 Using data from pages 41 and 45, compare COVID hospitalization rates.
And finally, there is a mortality comparison, based on pages 44 and 45 of the UKHSA Vaccine Monitoring Report for week 13, 2022.17 Anyone over 40 who gets two shots is now more likely to die from COVID than unvaccinated people of the same age.
Negative vaccine effectiveness in the real world
The Daily Expose continues to calculate and chart the real-world effectiveness rates of COVID jab, and it’s serious news:18
“If rates per 100,000 are higher among those vaccinated, this means that COVID-19 shots are being shown to have a negative effect in the real world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula, we were able to accurately decode real-world effectiveness across each age group.
Pfizer Vaccine Formula: Unvaccinated rate per 100k – Vaccination rate per 100k / Unvaccinated rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine efficacy…
These data suggest that all dual-vaccinated persons over 18 years of age have a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of infection, with a negative vaccine efficacy of 87% in 18- to 29-year-olds, and an efficacy The vaccine was negative 178% in people over 80 years of age. .
[A]Dual-vaccinated persons over 30 years of age had a 0.2 to 2-fold increased risk of hospitalization, with vaccine efficacy being negative 1% in those aged 30 to 39 years and vaccine efficacy being negative 76. % in people over 80 years old.
The following chart shows the actual effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine against mortality in the UK double-vaccinated population, based on the mortality rates provided above…
[A]Dual-vaccinated individuals over 40 years of age are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from COVID-19, with vaccine efficacy being negative-90% in people 30 to 39 years of age, and vaccine efficacy negative 156% in people over 80 years old. ”
Pfizer has hired 600 to handle an unprecedented volume of reports
For the past two years we’ve been monitoring the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), we shake our heads with skepticism as the numbers climb into the hundreds each week, rapidly increasing injuries. cumulative for all other vaccines. in the past 32 years.19
As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports, including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.20 There has never been a medical product in modern history that could compare. Nothing is as traumatic and lethal as these experimental injections.
In an earlier series of documents, we learned that Pfizer received 42,086 case reports totaling 158,893 events during the first three months of the rollout. In that release, the number of doses shipped was recalculated, but in the April 1, 2022 release, it was unreacted, meaning we can now calculate the percentage of side effects reported to Pfizer during those first three months.
From December 2020 to the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped 126,212,580 doses of its jab mRNA worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get a side effect per dose rate of close to 1 in 800,21 but just irresponsible madness.
We also now have documentation showing that Pfizer, at the end of February 2021, hired an additional 600 full-time employees to handle the unprecedented influx of adverse event reports, and they anticipate that by the end of June, In 2021, they will end up hiring more than 1,800.22
Ultimately, the COVID collision will go down in history as the largest medical incident ever with the willing involvement of both pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies. And there is no end in sight.
In March 2022, the FDA went ahead and authorized dosages of 4 and 5, based on a previous study23,24 showed that the fourth injection of Moderna was 11% effective and caused side effects in 40% of recipients, and the fourth shot of Pfizer was 30% effective and caused side effects in 80% of people.
I’m not sure what will happen in order for this public health nightmare to end and the responsible parties to be held accountable for their criminal negligence, but clearly, we haven’t caused any harm. serious indignation of the masses.
