Coal Divesters Sweetening the Deal with New Long Term Permits – Watts Up With That?
![Coal Divesters Sweetening the Deal with New Long Term Permits – Watts Up With That?](https://news7g.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Fake-Divestment-Sale-780x470.jpg)
Visitor essay by Eric Worrall
In accordance with Bloomberg, mining giants are pimping each final penny out of their divestment coal asset gross sales, sweetening the deal by arranging long run working permits for the brand new consumers.
Traders Pushed Mining Giants to Stop Coal. Now It’s Backfiring
There’s rising unease that the divestment marketing campaign may result in extra coal being produced for longer.By Thomas Biesheuvel +Follow9 November 2021, 10:01 GMT+10
It was speculated to be a giant win for local weather activists: one other of the world’s strongest mining corporations had caved to investor calls for that it cease digging up coal.
As an alternative, Anglo American Plc’s exit from coal has turn out to be a case examine for unintended penalties, reworking mines that have been scheduled for eventual closure into the engine room for a growth-hungry coal enterprise.
And whereas it’s a very stark instance, it’s not the one one. When rival BHP Group was struggling to promote an Australian colliery this 12 months, the corporate shocked buyers by applying to extend mining on the website by one other 20 years — an obvious try and sweeten its enchantment to potential consumers.
Now, after years of lobbying blue-chip corporations to cease mining the most-polluting gasoline, there’s a rising unease amongst local weather activists and a few buyers that the coverage a lot of them championed may result in extra coal being produced for longer. Senior mining executives say the message from their shareholders is evolving to acknowledge that danger, they usually’re now not pushing as arduous for blanket withdrawals.
…
Learn extra: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-09/investors-pushed-mining-giants-to-quit-coal-now-it-s-backfiring
Pimping coal mines this manner in my view is a type of greenwashing.
The worth of a mine is predicated on its potential future earnings. By attaching long run working permits to the sale, mining corporations are boosting the sale worth by boosting confidence in long run operation, and in doing so are not directly cashing in on future coal extraction.
This grossly hypocritical place permits mining teams which publicly proclaim their divestment of coal holdings to successfully declare a share of the revenue from future coal extraction on the mine they simply bought, when the brand new long run working allow elevates the sale worth.
If corporations with coal holdings genuinely wished to close down coal, they might merely present possession of the mines to Greenpeace or the WWF. However this may imply writing off all of the revenue they might have constituted of future coal gross sales, slightly than sneaking future earnings from coal onto their books through a intelligent accounting trick.