ID Jeff
Observation is the key to scientific research. When you observe an apple being dropped to the ground, this observation makes more sense than any theory of spontaneous levitation that has ever existed. Such observations have led us to recognize and attempt to quantify the laws of physics in the form of mathematical equations. These equations are not really a perfect reflection of reality, but rather the best combination of our understanding and observation. I will give a clear and well observed effect that I think most people can understand.
Two cars collide head-on, each traveling at 30 mph. Car 1 moves with speed v (30 mph), car 2 is traveling straight at a speed friend (30 mph).
Closing speed between two cars (S) = v + u is closing speed 30 +30 = 60 mph.
In the early 1900s, the theory of relativity was discovered and it was found that at very high velocities Galilean physics did not agree with observations. This causes a change in the physical expression, resulting in a different (look) equation.
This equation looks different and at first glance seems too complicated. Not so. The S in this equation is the current physics-based closing rate between cars, rather than the S of the old days. Then you realize, the speed of light squared, c^2 is a really big number, and it’s at the bottom of the equation. Interestingly, when v is multiplied by u (vu at the end of the equation), which is usually very small compared to the speed of light squared c^2 (vu/c^2 in the equation is actually zero at a distance of 30 miles each). hours) and the equation actually converges to the Galilean criterion of the previous observation.
S = v + u / (1+0) = v + u
So the result is relativistic physics equations, which now fit a wider range of OBSERVATIONS. Both low speed, two cars at 30 miles per hour, and high speed 80% of the speed of light are all consistent with our ability to see. The Galilean equation is imperfect and cannot represent high-speed observations – only.
Observe:
In most science (not most anymore), observation is the uncontaminated king of the research department. However, money is what pays for observation. This causes problems much more often than most people will realize (my unwelcome but liberal opinion).
A long time ago, well-paid “scientists” for global warming research purposely shifted the narrative from Global Warming to Climate Change. The reason for this is political, but from a scientific point of view it has the first degree of theoretical justification. The movement of energy in the climate system is responsible for the change in weather patterns. If you have a lot of energy moving in the system, It is perfectly reasonable and even necessary to conclude with absolute certainty, that you will see more severe weather patterns. Hurricanes must become stronger because they are heat pumps that move heat from the ocean to the upper layers of the atmosphere. More heat equals bigger storms. Rain will become more common as the warmer atmosphere allows for more variation. However, science knows that measurements are imperfect because there is always noise in the data – and the size of the expected signal matters.
Just to be clear, you can observe the truth of those claims on other planets. Jupiter’s red spot is large and continuous because it is moving enormous amounts of heat from the lower atmosphere to the upper atmosphere. The speed and size of the wind is beyond any form of observation we have ever seen on Earth, and this is a known fact. The surface of Venus is hot enough to melt solder, which is largely caused by its dense CO2 atmosphere. These are real world examples (some pun intended), but they cannot be denied as they are OBSERVATIONS.
But all science, including “Climate Science™“, it’s all about math, and it suffers from the same problems as the Galilean velocity equation — Size really matters.
Global warming is real:
Global warming is an effect caused by radiant emission from the visual spectrum (sunlight) that is absorbed into the Earth’s surface and then an absolutely equal amount of energy is emitted back. space at much longer wavelengths. In general, this is characterized by the imperfect Planck black-body equations. literally zero scientific debate on global warming of this magnitude. Zero is a small number. Once again, a first-level scientific assessment has firmly established that the impact of global warming is real and completely indisputable.
Again, size matters. Tay side people!!! Are you still with me?
If the car doesn’t go more than 1000 Miles per SECOND (which is pretty fast), Galileo’s equations are correct in our ability to observe speed. If you get bored, you can find the result of the relativistic equation fair The Galilean equation leads to a large number of significant figures. Therefore, the relativistic equation is true and the Galilean equation cannot be said to be false. After all, we all used the same Galilean equation to finish high school.
What I’m saying is that these two different equations boil down to the same number through most human observation, because SIZE IS IMPORTANT in science.
So… bullet points for us chicken brains
- Global warming is definitely real
- Climate change also exists
- Size problem
Time for a few charts. It’s science after all.
The chart below is from Dr. Roy Spencer’s Great Blog – linked here and on the right.
The rate of “Global Warming” is measured by satellites in the lower part of the atmosphere. These values are essentially unpolluted by the ground effect that surface stations include but, much more importantly, they comprise most of the thermal energy in the atmosphere. This means that global warming since 1979 is about 0.5 degrees Celsius. We humans don’t have any scientific idea about how much of it CO2 causes.
In total, this is a VERY SMALL level of warming.
Much smaller than any of the climate models predicted, and the graph above is truly the best humanistic data on atmospheric temperature.
This next chart compares OBSERVATIONS of temperature change with climate models for predicted temperature change. The left blue bar is the observation.
Now we all can OBSERVATION, the key to all Real Climate™ observed lower than all climate models. ALL climate models have predicted more warming than we observe. What people don’t know is that HIGHEST pattern trends are the ones that are politically represented as RIGHT patterns and the LOWER patterns on the left side of the chart above are usually the ones that are expressed as models if we were to do something to fix the alleged, but unobserved, climate “problem”.
Now, I have repeatedly stated with links and evidence from the government and even my own science, the following equally true OBSERVED facts:
There is no trend in the storm
No drought tendency
No trend in the rain
No, the fish is not shrunk
No butterfly species is extinct
polar bears are doing great
Antarctica’s ice is not shrinking
Sea level rise is a dead line in 150 years
Penguins are also doing very well.
So the chicken brain in the human body says, JEFF, you just told me this is real. ALSO I TELL YOU THAT IN SCIENCE, —– SIZE OF THE PROBLEM.
Energy flow:
Power is the flow of energy, horsepower, Watts – energy per time.
Energy is Joules, BTU’s.
A bit complicated for this post but many people here understand what I wrote.
Energy is what you get when the power of sunlight is temporarily slowed down by the global warming effects of carbon dioxide. Retry? Global warming energy is the accumulation of heat as sunlight energy takes longer to escape into space.
The real scientific question then becomes, how much more heat can we expect with a change in CO2 and what effect that will have on our weather patterns. How big will the storms be? How bad will the drought be? How hot will we be?
Unfortunately for the sandwich board, government sponsored, doom sooth, the last class of the world, this answer is very simple and very easy to understand. Unfortunately for you, it’s in the form of a graph.
The emission temperature of the Earth is about 285 degrees Kelvin. Space is very close to 0, like 3 degrees kelvin. We should use Kelvin when determining how much CHANGE in the energy flow will occur, with absolute zero (no molecular temperature) being zero Kevlin. The Kelvin scale doesn’t use negative numbers (don’t understand all technicians on this matter).
Now the CAM block on the left sidebar is NOT global warming. Global warming is the Gray bar – which you can’t see – above the orange bar on the left.
Size issue- Don’t know if I mentioned that.
CO2 warming forces us to use uncontrollable electric vehicles and endless global regulation does NOT show up on this chart. The gray bar you can’t see is also the reason we can’t measure ANY change in weather patterns on earth due to human-caused global warming. Like the relativistic effect of a 30mph car crash, global warming are simply too small to cause large changes in weather, even when magnified by climate models.
That’s also why we will never measure the change for the following items caused by CO2:
stormy
drought
rain
fish size
butterflies
Polar bears
Antarctic ice
Sea level rise
penguin
According to OBSERVATIONS and according to the first-order elementary physics of Climate science, the effect is TOO SMALL to cause harm or even a microscopically observable change in most of the values I have written. FOREVER. Remember, no matter how small global warming is, it is real and that scientific fact never changes.
mix atmosphere:
The last point I need to make is when CO2-induced warming occurs in the atmosphere, it’s a mixed phenomenon. Imagine for more than 10 years trying to produce a measurable change in the temperature difference between Germany and France caused by a microscopic change in energy motion as shown in the graph Kelvin above. It confuses the mind that “Climate Science™” would even suggest such a thing, but that is what the term “climate change” in fake news means. Extreme weather caused by extra energy mobility — gray bars that no one can really see in the chart above.
And that is:
Climate change is a complete, government-funded hoax to the greatest extent of any scientific hoax AND Global warming is very real and very minor. This is a scientific FACT, proven by all available scientific observations.
It’s also embarrassingly clear. Humanity needs to improve its intellect or we will never achieve the best of our imagination.
Related
