Kaspersky excels with its easy-to-use interface and automation features, while Bitdefender has the edge in overall detection rates and lab test results, but with a slightly tougher learning curve .
Cybersecurity threats have become one of the biggest concerns for businesses of all sizes. These security threats are often harder to detect than in the past, creating a much more difficult task for OpSec engineers to find remedial solutions.
Two strong endpoint detection and response tool being deployed around the world are Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security. Both of these EDR software solutions provide powerful threat detection, removal, and management tools. Below, we’ll take a look at what Kaspersky and Bitdefender have in common, and where each outperforms the other.
SEE: Mobile device privacy policy (TechRepublic Premium)
Transfer to:
What is Kaspersky?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is an EDR suite designed for small and large businesses who need a scalable solution for their OpSec requirements. With a focus on automation and automated tasks, Kaspersky shines in smaller environments where there may not be the staff to dedicate to each task.
Users often note that it’s easy to use the dashboard interface is one of the best in the industry, with a very short learning curve required to get the most out of it.
What is Bitdefender?
Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security seems to take on a similar role to Kaspersky by providing a complete EDR solution aimed at SecOps professionals. Boasting a higher lab detection score than Kaspersky in tests like MITER, which mimics a state-sponsored cyberattack, Bitdefender is generally considered a bit more advanced in detection techniques. its.
Aimed at more fully staffed SecOps, installation can be more complicated with Bitdefender. While not as focused on automation as Kaspersky, Bitdefender offers greater flexibility and customization for teams with enough manpower to take advantage of it.
Kaspersky vs Bitdefender: Feature Comparison
| Feature | Kaspersky | Bitdefender |
|---|---|---|
| Dashboard Dashboard | It’s correct | It’s correct |
| On-premises, cloud, and hybrid dashboards | It’s correct | It’s correct |
| Lock mode | It’s correct | No |
| Automatic sandbox | It’s correct | It’s correct |
| Automatically detect and fix IoC | It’s correct | No |
| Detect machine learning | It’s correct | It’s correct |
Head-to-head comparison: Kaspersky vs Bitdefender
Dashboard Dashboard
Both Kaspersky and Bitdefender provide a detailed control panel to access all the features and configurations for both tools. Kaspersky uses Kaspersky Security Center. This dashboard view is loved by users for its simplicity, interface, and easy-to-learn layout. It’s best for smaller businesses or those who may not have dedicated staff to manage more complex stuff.
Bitdefender also offers a control panel, but it is certainly more complex than Kaspersky offers and users often feel this is one of the low points of the software. It’s very capable, but it has a steep learning curve and isn’t intuitive or easy to decipher at first glance. For this reason, it’s best suited for larger businesses who have staff dedicated to figuring out its nuances.
Implementation
Both of these options are SaaS tools and relatively simple to implement, but users say Bitdefender is the easier of the two. While easier to use after deployment, Kaspersky deploys a bit slower at the outset in most situations, according to many SecOps engineers experienced with both.
Bitdefender has most of the features available, while Kaspersky has a slightly more feature-heavy model with hierarchical modules and pricing for different functions. This can make it difficult for smaller businesses to determine exactly what they need to configure for a new installation.
Detect and fix
Kaspersky allows users to set parameters and automatic actions that will take place to detect various types and other threats. This can greatly reduce the workload for employees who may not have a dedicated team or want to streamline their efforts.
Bitdefender doesn’t offer the same level of automation, but they do offer a vulnerability management feature that can check trends and history across the network to detect weaknesses. This can help speed up tasks related to cybersecurity audits and threat management.
Choosing between Kaspersky and Bitdefender
Both of these EDR options are well tested and very capable for businesses of almost any size. They detect a wide range of threats and offer dynamic options to respond to those threats quickly.
The main difference lies in the user interface between the two, with Kaspersky clearly leaning towards small and medium businesses that don’t need dedicated staff to manage the entire software. Their automation tools also help work towards an easier approach to EDR management.
On the other hand, Bitdefender is much more comfortable in the hands of dedicated SecOps engineers, where the interface is a bit tougher and the advanced features can be taken full advantage of.
