Prince William’s overpopulation comments will make women unpopular

As I was looking for a reaction to the second speech to the British throne gave at an awards ceremony on Monday where did he say: “The growing pressure on Africa’s wildlife and wild spaces, due to human populations, poses an enormous challenge for conservationists”, I came across these observations. almost exactly the same as he made four years ago.

Prince reported as said in 2017 at a gala dinner for the same charity, The Tusk Trust. “Africa’s rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050 – a staggering three-and-a-half million people per month. There is no doubt that this increase causes Wildlife and habitats are under enormous pressure.”

Then, as now, people were quick to point out two things: the first was the hypocrisy of the Duke of Cambridge. Here is a man who has determined his family size, travels frequently by plane, and lives a lavish lifestyle (read: has a high carbon footprint) in one of the worlds 15 countries that consume the most energy. (Please note, energy consumption is a limited measure of the UK’s environmental impact as the UK mainly imports its goods. Someone else – China – is counting the energy used to build produce those goods.)

But there’s much that doesn’t go with what Prince William said: identifying population growth as the problem, logically presenting population control as the solution. This automatically turns the uterus into legitimate sites for climate policy. In other words, women’s rights to contraception and education have been weaponized: they are no longer tools to help women access better choice, but instead, this goal of gender equality is stolen. to impose the agenda of others.

Imagine for a minute that we accept that population growth – and specifically population growth in Africa – leads to greater pressure on wildlife, an argument that Prince William believes is undeniable. How should this be resolved? One-child policy as a condition for development assistance? How will the impact of that decrease in population be measured? Who will say if it goes far enough to minimize environmental damage? How about not?

All must realize that panic over population growth in Black, Brown and Indigenous parts of the world is reinforced by racial and class prejudices. It should be clear that what every woman needs is the freedom to choose for herself if, when and how many children to have. If, after years of talking about conservation, Prince William doesn’t think his interest in Africa’s wildlife can bring about stigmatizing African women, perhaps now is the time. he should do so.

Story of the week

Women behave badly: Kanno Sugako

Kanno Sugako (1881 – 1911) was one of Japan’s first female journalists and prominent feminists, known for her writings that explored the multitude of oppressions faced by women in a society. modernization.

She often condemns society’s praise of “feminine virtues” such as virginity: “Where does all these perverted men have the right to insist on chastity? fathers, husbands? good!” But Sugako also opposes prostitution, referring to geishas at first as “morally corrupt individuals” and then as “fallen women”.

“For us women, the most pressing task is to develop a sense of self… an educated and socially savvy woman to some degree must certainly be disgruntled and angry about her status. mine,” she wrote.

Other stories worth your time

Join the conversation

Over the next six months, White lie will investigate skin whitening practices around the world, with the aim of exposing the underlying motives of colorism, the industry that profits from it, and the costs of colorism. individuals and communities around the world.

Share your story with us on social media using hashtags #FightingWhiteningor send us tips by emailing [email protected]