Requested by CNN about Sandberg’s quote and whether or not she stood by it, a Fb spokesperson pointed to the larger context round Sandberg’s quote. She had been noting that Jan. 6 group occurred largely on-line, together with however not restricted to on Fb’s platforms, the spokesperson mentioned.
One in all Haugen’s central allegations concerning the firm focuses on the assault on the Capitol. In a SEC disclosure she alleges, “Fb misled buyers and the general public about its position perpetuating misinformation and violent extremism regarding the 2020 election and January sixth revolt.”
Fb denies the premise of Haugen’s conclusions and says Haugen has cherry-picked paperwork to current an unfair portrayal of the corporate.
“The accountability for the violence that occurred on January 6 lies with those that attacked our Capitol and people who inspired them. We took steps to restrict content material that sought to delegitimize the election, together with labeling candidates’ posts with the newest vote rely after Mr. Trump prematurely declared victory, pausing new political promoting and eradicating the unique #StopTheSteal Group in November,” Fb spokesperson Andy Stone advised CNN Friday.
“After the violence on the Capitol erupted and as we noticed continued makes an attempt to arrange occasions to dispute the result of the presidential election, we eliminated content material with the phrase ‘cease the steal’ underneath our Coordinating Hurt coverage and suspended Trump from our platform.”
“Our enforcement was piecemeal”
“Hindsight is 20:20,” the creator or authors of the evaluation, who should not identifiable from what was supplied, write. “[A]t the time it was very troublesome to know whether or not what we have been seeing was a coordinated effort to delegitimize the election, or whether or not it was protected free expression by customers who have been afraid and confused and deserved our empathy. However hindsight being 20:20 makes it all of the extra vital to look again to study what we will concerning the progress of the election delegitimatizing actions that grew, unfold conspiracy, and helped incite the Capitol revolt.”
The evaluation discovered that the insurance policies and procedures Fb had in place have been merely less than the duty of slowing, a lot much less halting, the “meteoric” progress of Cease the Steal. As an illustration, these behind the evaluation famous that Fb handled every bit of content material and individual or group inside Cease the Steal individually, fairly than as half of a complete, with dire outcomes.
“Nearly all the quickest rising FB Teams have been Cease the Steal throughout their peak progress,” the evaluation says. “As a result of we have been every entity individually, fairly than as a cohesive motion, we have been solely in a position to take down particular person Teams and Pages as soon as they exceeded a violation threshold. We weren’t in a position to act on easy objects like posts and feedback as a result of they individually tended to not violate, even when they have been surrounded by hate, violence, and misinformation.”
This strategy did ultimately change, in accordance with the evaluation — after it was too late.
“After the Capitol revolt and a wave of Storm the Capitol occasions throughout the nation, we realized that the person delegitimizing Teams, Pages, and slogans did represent a cohesive motion,” the evaluation says.
This was not the one method by which Fb had didn’t anticipate one thing like Cease the Steal, or by which its response was missing.
Fb has for a while now had a coverage banning “coordinated inauthentic habits” on its platforms. This ban permits it to take motion towards, as an example, the Russian troll military that labored to intervene with the 2016 US election by accounts and pages set as much as look as in the event that they have been American However, the evaluation notes with emphasis, the corporate had “little coverage round coordinated genuine hurt” — that’s, little to cease folks organizing underneath their actual names and never hiding their intention to get the nation to reject the outcomes of the election.
Cease the Steal and Patriot Get together teams “weren’t instantly mobilizing offline hurt, nor have been they instantly selling militarization,” the evaluation says. “As an alternative, they have been amplifying and normalizing misinformation and violent hate in a method that delegitimized a free and truthful democratic election. The hurt existed on the community degree: a person’s speech is protected, however as a motion, it normalized delegitimization and hate in a method that resulted in offline hurt and hurt to the norms underpinning democracy.”
The evaluation does word, nonetheless, that when Fb noticed the outcomes of Cease the Steal on January sixth and took motion, it was in a position to deploy measures that stymied the expansion of each Cease the Steal and Patriot Get together teams.
Fb’s Stone advised CNN, “Fb has taken extraordinary steps to deal with dangerous content material and we’ll proceed to do our half. We additionally carefully labored with legislation enforcement, each earlier than January sixth and within the days and weeks since, with the purpose of making certain that info linking the folks chargeable for January sixth to their crimes is out there.”
Pulling levers
Haugen started gathering proof concerning the firm earlier than she ultimately left the tech large final Could. To scale back the possibility of getting caught taking screenshots of inner Fb methods, she used her telephone to take pictures of her pc display.
Because the revolt was underway in Washington and Fb was making an attempt to get a deal with on the state of affairs, Haugen was snapping footage, documenting the corporate’s response.
One of many paperwork she captured, titled “Capitol Protest BTG [Break the Glass] Response,” was a chart of measures Fb may soak up response to the January sixth assault. The chart seems to have been ready beforehand; on the time Haugen photographed it, rather less than two hours after the Capitol was first breached, the corporate had instituted a few of these measures whereas others have been nonetheless into consideration. Among the many potential actions listed within the chart have been demoting “content material deemed more likely to violate our group requirements within the areas of hate speech, graphic violence, and violence and incitement.”
The web page labeled these as “US2020 Levers, beforehand rolled again.”
These “levers,” as Fb refers to them, are measures — guardrails — that the corporate put in place earlier than final yr’s Presidential election in an try to sluggish the unfold of hate and misinformation on the platform. Fb has not been clear in its public statements about what measures it did roll again after the election and why it did so at a time of tumult when the sitting president was calling the outcomes of the vote into query.
However in accordance with the “Capitol Protest BTG response” doc, the guardrails Fb reimplemented on January sixth included lowering the visibility of posts more likely to be reported and freezing “commenting on posts in Teams that begin to have a excessive price of hate speech and violence & incitement feedback,” amongst others.
Within the SEC disclosure, Haugen alleges that these levers have been reinstated “solely after the revolt flared up.”
Requested concerning the selections to dial the levers again after which push them out once more, Stone mentioned, “In phasing in after which adjusting extra measures earlier than, throughout and after the election, we took under consideration particular on-platforms alerts and data from our ongoing, common engagement with legislation enforcement. When these alerts modified, so did the measures.”
A by line
When Fb executives posted messages publicly and internally condemning the riot, some workers pushed again, even suggesting Fb might need had some culpability.
“There have been dozens of Cease the Steal teams lively up till yesterday, and I doubt they minced phrases about their intentions,” one worker wrote in response to a put up from Mike Schroepfer, Fb’s chief know-how officer.3
One other wrote, “All due respect, however have not we had sufficient time to determine easy methods to handle discourse with out enabling violence? We have been fueling this fireplace for a very long time and we should not be shocked it is now uncontrolled.”
Different Fb workers went additional, claiming selections by firm management over time had helped create the circumstances that paved the way in which for an assault on the US Capitol.
Responding to Schroepfer’s put up, one staffer wrote that, “management overrides analysis based mostly coverage selections to higher serve folks just like the teams inciting violence in the present day. Rank and file employees have finished their half to establish adjustments to enhance our platforms however have been actively held again.”
One other staffer, referencing years of controversial and questionable decision-making by Fb management round political speech concluded, “historical past is not going to choose us kindly.”
