Over the past two years, I and many others have detailed ways in which the number of COVID-19 deaths has been surpassed to create the illusion of a pandemic that is far worse than it actually is.
Now, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and individual states are re-checking their death statistics, showing we were right. The deaths were initially exaggerated for political purposes, and now they are being downplayed for the same reason.
CDC eliminates more than 72,000 COVID-19 deaths
As reported by The Defenders,first On March 14, 2022, the CDC removed 72,277 “COVID deaths” from its tally, including 24% of those attributed to children under the age of 18.2,3 They claim that a “coding logic error”, a faulty algorithm, “accidentally” counted deaths unrelated to COVID. As reported by Udumbara:4
“A number of child deaths have been attributed to COVID-19, according to a CDC’s Wonder system search, including deaths from drowning or drug use that are considered the primary causes of death. ”
Meanwhile, the CDC used false statistics about child deaths to promote COVID vaccinations for 5 to 7 year olds. In November 2021, CDC director Rochelle Walensky cited that data to justify the recommendation for emergency use authorization for the Pfizer shot for this age group.5
Somehow, we have to believe that it took the CDC two years to realize this error. It is simply unbelievable and Epoch Times has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for internal communications regarding data changes.6
Ironically, the adjustment comes shortly after fact-checking articles “explode” claims that the number of COVID deaths has been overestimated. For example, in early March, Health Feedback stated that “there is no evidence of COVID deaths being overestimated” and “evidence suggests otherwise.”7 However, we are here. The deaths were clearly overcounted, not undercounted. That fact check isn’t stale.
CDC has been turned into a propaganda agency
According to Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the scientific advisory committee on Child Health Defense, the CDC is taking the data to justify its public health policies, and when it’s caught, it’s just to blame for “outdated IT systems”. In a March 19, 2022 article, she writes:8
“CDC is not a public health agency. This is an overt propaganda agency that collects huge amounts of data. CDC coordinates its vast data library to create presentations that support current administration’s public health policies…
A 2007 Senate oversight report on the CDC notes the agency spent $106 million on Thomas R. Harkin’s Center for Global Communications (and Visitors), and summarizes its 115-page report. with the following content:
‘A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing epidemics has spent hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes on failed containment efforts, international waste facilities and lavish facilities, but cannot prove that they are controlling the epidemic. “
Health Officials End Reporting COVID-19 Deaths
Curiously, three months before the CDC started changing its mortality statistics, the US Department of Health and Human Services stopped collecting data on hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 completely. Announcement from HHS9 changes to reporting requirements for hospitals and acute care facilities January 6, 2022. New guidance, effective February 2, notes “The removal of fields no longer required to report”, which included “previous day’s COVID-19 deaths”.
What are they trying to hide? Are they stopping the flow of data to prevent inspection and analysis? According to some, the HHS hospital data is some of the best we have in the US, so it doesn’t make sense to end the data collection. January 2021, Alex C. Madrigal, co-founder of the COVID Tracking Project, wrote:ten
“In a series of analyzes that we have done over the past several months, we have come to the conclusion that is almost the opposite of other media. Hospitalization data from HHS is currently the best and most detailed publicly available data on the pandemic. “
An unnamed federal health official spoke to a WSWS reporter,11 called the move to stop reporting COVID-29 hospital deaths “incomprehensible.” The official added:
“This is the only consistent, reliable, and actionable dataset at the federal level. Ninety-nine percent of hospitals report 100% of data every day. I don’t know of any scientist who wants less data.”
Changing the proof definition for the COVID narrative
From the start of the pandemic, changing definitions has allowed authorities to manipulate data in any way they need to. Now, states are starting to change how they define “COVID deaths,” resulting in a drop in mortality. In Massachusetts, for example, the number of COVID deaths fell to 3,700 after the state changed its definition to match that of the State Council and territorial epidemiologists.twelfth
As CBS Boston reports:13
“The state says it currently defines death from COVID to include anyone with an illness listed as the cause of death on their death certificate. It also includes anyone who was diagnosed within 60 days but did not have it listed as the cause on their death certificate. Under the new definition, the timeframe is changed to 30 days for those who do not have a COVID diagnosis on their death certificate.
For the record, counting a person who died from any cause as a COVID death simply because they tested positive within 30 days of death is still a completely inaccurate way to determine the true death toll from this virus, because we know the PCR test has a positive rate error of about 97% when run at 35 cycles or greater,14 as standard from the outset.
Results from home trials not reported
The number of cases is also being revised down. In mid-January 2022, the Biden administration began distributing half a billion home COVID tests to the American public,15 and the results from those are not reported anywhere.16 As a result, the number of cases will be skewed down. According to 13NewsNow:17
“…the potential for error in case numbers is why health officials monitor a number of COVID-19 metrics, like hospitalizations, deaths and now, even virus samples within wastewater18 – the metrics don’t necessarily rely on people to get tested or report results they get at home. “
However, HHS no longer requires hospitals to report COVID deaths, which is one of the metrics health officials are said to focus on instead of tracking cases. Don’t get me wrong, the PCR test was a scam from the start and I wouldn’t recommend paying much attention to those data. The problem here is that tracking the COVID data was seriously flawed from the start.
What they’re really trying to do is move to passive monitoring, starting with wastewater sampling.19 Ultimately, the goal is to track each person’s biological processes in real time, and this is part of the Transhuman Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reconstruction.
CDC hides data
To make matters even more horrifying, the CDC is also hiding data on COVID hospitalizations and COVID stabs. The justification for not making certain data public is that people are “misinterpreting” the data. In other words, the data shows that COVID jabs don’t work, and the CDC doesn’t want that to be widely known.
It also collected data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters, but for some reason did not include data on 18- to 49-year-olds in any of its publications. “Coincidentally,” this is “the group least likely to benefit from additional footage,” the Times pointed out, adding:21
“Much of the information withheld could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to control the virus. Timely, detailed data on hospital admissions by age and race will help health officials identify and help populations most at risk. Information on hospitalizations and deaths by age and immunization status will help inform whether healthy adults need booster shots.”
COVID has served a purely political agenda
Over the past two years, the pandemic has been used to usher in a series of radical changes that would never have been accepted had it not been for widespread panic. It was used to implement illegal voting rules, which appear to have influenced the 2020 election.
It was used to announce the urgent need for a “Great Reunion” and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It is used to deprive basic human rights and justify radical environmental policies that will lead to lower standards of living.
It has also been used to dramatically shift the vaccine industry from conventional vaccine production using eggs to the risky use of transgenic technology. The only thing the pandemic hasn’t been used to is making recommendations that actually improve public health. And throughout, the data has been massaged and manipulated to justify the unwarranted.
Now, it looks like data is being manipulated again – this time to artificially end the COVID crisis so the Biden administration can give it credit in the upcoming elections. As stated in a February 24, 2022 letter from Impact Research, titled “Winning COVID-19”:22,23
“It is time for the Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis phase of the COVID war, pointing to key victories like vaccine distribution and bringing economic stability to Americans. , and completely entered the rebuilding phase after any war. Below, we offer some strategic thinking for Democrats to position themselves on COVID-19…”
Strategic positioning includes declaring the crisis period over; promote “more normal feeling and action;” and stand with those who are exhausted with COVID and don’t want to hear about it anymore. Do not set the COVID standard of zero as a “winning condition” and “stop talking about limitations and the unknown future ahead”.
“If Democrats continue to take their stance that COVID precautions are prioritized over learning to live in a world where COVID exists, but does not dominate, they risk paying a heavy price for it in November.” . the letter states.24
Anthony Fauci probably didn’t get this memo, as he is out there signaling that we can expect a return to COVID restrictions at any point. In an interview with CNN in mid-March, he said that “we need to be flexible” and that “if we see a resurgence, we have to be able to turn around and come back to any degree of mitigation.” which is commensurate with the situation. We can’t just say “We’re done, now we’ll move on.”
Based on what we’ve seen so far, I wouldn’t be surprised if this “pivot” back to COVID crisis mode happens just before the midterms.
