Hi guys. I have been following you. beautiful pictures
It’s like the moment when two people have been dating for a while and decide they both need space.
They are still dating, but the terms have changed.
What will she do tonight when I don’t hear from her? Why didn’t he text me last night before he went to bed?
What are we talking about today? Why, work remotelyof course.
Many companies now want to cohabit again with their remote employees.
Many remote workers have found that they are quite happy to work remotely and stay away from their commute. And, well, the need to dress and act like they really like their co-workers.
Also: Working remotely or back in the office: Why the biggest challenges still lie ahead
During the pandemic, too many managers have entered the worst school of thought possible – the Micromanagement Academy.
They installed monitoring software on their employees’ laptops. And, somehow, they still believe that these employees are not productive enough. Anything effective really makes sense.
Thankfully, wise brains have spent a considerable amount of time searching for solutions by studying deeper feelings.
Welcome then, Raghu Krishnamoorthy. He is a senior fellow and director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Director of Learning doctoral program.
With such a lengthy title, you can imagine he could offer some lessons on the remote work management conundrum.
Write in Harvard Business ReviewKrishnamoorthy explain that while the managers were doing whatever the managers thought they were doing, the employees were experiencing dramatic changes in emotions.
The shades are quite moving.
Also: Those who work remotely say they are productive from home. The owner does not agree
“My key finding was a subtle but important change in the way employees expect their managers to work with them,” says Krishnamoorthy. “They want their manager to be present, to practice and operate with vigilance without being intrusive.”
So employees want their boss to hover over them, but as discreetly as possible? Now, there’s an unnatural balancing act, especially for bosses who are used to giving orders and expressing themselves in a judgmental way.
And now we come to the part where the modern, remote boss-employee relationship is really like a couple giving each other space.
Krishnamoorthy said: “Employees don’t want their managers to micromanage; they want their manager to have a microscopic understanding of their work,” says Krishnamoorthy.
It’s fascinating that remote work – and the concurrent pandemic – has created a new consideration for the human spirit.
We talk more freely about mental health issues. And now, it seems, we want more of a meaningful human relationship with our bosses.
Maybe it’s an ever-present desire. Perhaps the change in the nature of the business – and the sudden increase in the total number of jobs – has allowed employees to ask for more.
Also: Working remotely or in the office? Why the tide can turn back
Krishnamoorthy offers an uplifting sentence to describe the new motivation. It is a mantra for all those who still believe they can become excellent managers.
“Micro-savvy is trusting, but making sure there are no unintended collisions; delegating, but there to keep workers from tripping; being flexible but always heeding the warning signs,” he said. .”
In essence, a good manager must be a master.
Those are your remote workers. They want to be trusted, but they also want to be helped. They want to feel less constrained, but they still want to be managed.
And what do managers get in return? How about respect?
“My research shows that employees will begin to appreciate the role of a manager more when working from home full-time by 2020,” says Krishnamoorthy. “Having a manager is helpful, as long as managers move from managing time, activities, or physical presence to managing results and outcomes.”
So there, the managers. You have your homework. They want you to care more, follow less, and your muscles even less than that. They want you to notice what they do and how effectively they contribute.
Can you do it?
more Technically incorrect
