if you have used to have to buy tires (which, if you’re reading Jalopnik, you’ve probably already read), you know that good tires cost a fortune. Want to replace the in-stock Michelins or Continentals on your trip with something similar? Expectation spend about $1,000 without breaking a sweat. But, of course, the big tire brands aren’t the only ones — So are today’s cheap tires good enough to save a few bucks?
In case you lost it:
UK tire review site TireReviews.com wants to find out, so it pitted a Continental PremiumContact 7 with eight cheap tires (some of which are EU/UK only). As a result, it was not possible to sell many cheap tires.
The area of most concern is the difference in braking performance on wet roads, where the Conti has just left the competition. This test is important because it is a near-worst case scenario for tires and the consequences of a wrong test can be very serious.
There is still quite a noticeable difference between the tires in dry conditions, although not as pronounced as in previous tests, and here we see the Continental leading the convoy again. However, the rest of the pitch has performance closer to premium tyres, with the Tomket Sport being the best of the rest.
Another interesting thing about this particular test is the decision to test tires that have been inactive all season. This makes sense because people who are buying basic tires for their basic cars are more likely to try and save than people who are buying maximum performance summer tires for their sports cars. , though I’m curious about how to test that. will rotate.
In the end, the takeaway is that if you can’t afford a tire with a well-known brand at all, then some popular brands are the most viable option, if performance is much less, but make sure Make sure to leave some extra room for the brakes, lest you find yourself in an accident.
