Health

Ukraine on fire: Oliver Stone’s 2016 documentary


Ukraine is an ancient and proud land, a border region where East meets West. Its blue and yellow flag represents the sky and the wheat fields, and its hunted rich land was used as a road – during World War I and World War II – for Western powers as they tried to conquer the East.

But, as noted in “Ukraine on Fire,” a 2016 documentary produced by Oliver Stone, “every time, the Ukrainian people pay the highest price for these great power games. .”first As a result, Ukraine, besieged by greater powers on all sides, must master the art of changing sides.Dear teacher

Beginning in the mid-17th century, Ukrainian leader Bogdan Khmelnitskiy broke the armistice with Poland and sided with the more powerful Russia. Five decades later, during the Russo-Swedish War, Ukrainian leader Ivan Mazepa broke his alliance with Russia and joined the Swedish invasion force. Ukraine became a protectorate of Germany in 1918, after Russia agreed to the conditions of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.

Ukraine’s fate is often written by third parties, and the film states, “The truth is, Ukraine was never a unified country. When World War II broke out, a large portion of the population of the West was divided. Ukraine welcomed the German soldiers as liberators from recently forcing them to rule the Soviet Union and openly cooperated with the Germans.”2

Organization of Ukrainian nationalists committed genocide

While the full scale of cooperation was not disclosed for many years, entire divisions and battalions were formed by Ukrainian collaborators, and at the beginning of the war more than 80,000 people voluntarily enrolled in the Division. “Galicia,” known as extremist. against Jews, Poles and Russians on the territory of Ukraine.

Many members of these military groups come from the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), which was founded in 1929 and whose ultimate goal is to create an independent, politically pure Ukraine. ethnicity. Their official flag is black and red – representing earth and blood. In 1940, Jewish and anti-communist Stepan Bandera became leader of the most radical division of the OUN, and declared an independent Ukraine in 1941.

This action kept his German allies in prison for most of the war, but he still spread his ideas from behind bars. “Many independent historians estimate that the OUN militia exterminated between 150,000 and 200,000 Jews in German-occupied Ukraine by the end of 1941.”3

The OUN eventually fought on par with German and Soviet forces, but by 1943 Soviet forces had repelled the Germans and began to liberate Ukraine. Western Ukraine, held by the Germans, was finally liberated in 1944, but Bandera’s regime continued to wage guerrilla warfare over Ukrainian villages until the 1950s.

In 1945, Germany submitted to its ally, and Ukraine remained part of the Soviet Union, but peace was short-lived. The United States and the Soviet Union, allies to defeat Nazi Germany, became enemies when the Cold War began, leaving the world under the constant threat of nuclear war for 45 years.

Ukraine’s Nazi leaders are protected by the CIA

American intelligence agencies always tracked Ukrainian nationalist organizations as a source of counterintelligence against the Soviet Union. The classified CIA documents show close ties between US intelligence and Ukrainian nationalists since 1946.

After World War II, Bandera and other Ukrainian Nazi leaders fled to Europe, and the CIA helped protect them. The CIA then informed the Immigration and Naturalization Service that it had hidden Bandera and other Ukrainians from the Soviet Union.

While the Nuremberg trials brought justice to the Nazi leaders, “Nazi Ukraine suffered the same fate, and some were even granted amnesty by the CIA.”4 According to the film, “By 1951, the Agency [CIA] defended the illegal activities of the security branch of OUN in the name of Cold War necessity. “5 Then, in a controversial transfer, in 1954, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave Crimea to Ukraine.

Ukraine was rocked by many revolutions

In 1989, Narodniy Rukh, or People’s Movement, emerged, advocating Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union and becoming an incubator for the leaders of neo-Nazis in Ukraine. One of them, Oleh Tyahnybok, founded the radical group Svoboda in 1991, which preached Bandera’s ideals. Additional groups follow up.

Also in 1991, the collapse of the Soviet Union meant that for the first time in modern history, Ukraine was truly independent. New businesses emerged as a result of the new liberal economy. The oligarchs emerged seemingly overnight, creating a class system with a few wealthy classes and many others struggling to survive.

Many subsequent revolutions, including the Orange Revolution of 2004, were kicked off by that year’s presidential election. Support for two candidates – Viktor Yushchenko and Viktor Yanukovych – again divided the country, east against west. Yushchenko’s wife, Kateryna Yushchenko, is a former US State Department official who served in the White House during the Reagan administration.

Yushchenko lost, but many disagreed and accused fraud. Mass demonstrations, with protesters wearing the orange of Yushchenko’s campaign, happened to overturn the results. The election was annulled and Yushchenko won the next election – after recovering from a mysterious intoxication, allegedly carried out by the State Security Service of Ukraine.6

US Meddling Coup encourages D’Etat

Yushchenko was not elected to a second term, but he granted Bandera “Hero Status” upon leaving office. Yanukovych became the next president, and he removed Bandera’s Hero status, but in 2013 the government announced it would halt plans to sign an association agreement with the European Union, instead back an offer from Russia.

Protests once again occurred, known as the Maidan Revolution. Days of peaceful protests turned violent and US intervention fanned the flames, encouraging protesters to overthrow Ukraine’s democratically elected government. As noted by the CATO Institute:7

“A decent respect for democratic institutions and procedures means that he [Yanukovych] must be able to serve his legitimate presidency, which ends in 2016… Neither the domestic opposition nor Washington and its allies of the European Union behave that way.

Instead, Western leaders have made it clear that they support the protesters’ efforts to force Mr Yanukovych to reverse course and ratify the EU deal or, if he fails to do so, remove the president. before the end of the term.

Senator John McCain (R AZ AZ), a ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, has arrived in Kiev to show solidarity with Euromaidan activists. McCain dined with opposition leaders, including members of the far-right Svoboda Party, and later appeared on stage in Maidan Square for a massive rally. He is side by side with the leader of Svoboda, Oleg Tyagnibok. “

A leaked phone call, intercepted by Russian intelligence, between Victoria Nuland, the assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and the US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffey Pyatt also openly discussed the plan. Plan to form a new Ukrainian government:8

“Candidates favored by the United States include Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who became prime minister after Yanukovych was ousted from power. During the phone call, Nuland enthusiastically stated that ‘Yats was the one’ who would do well. most work.

Nuland and Pyatt were involved in such a scheme at a time when Yanukovych was still the legitimate president of Ukraine. It is surprising that the diplomatic representatives of a foreign country – and a country that regularly makes demands to respect the democratic and sovereign processes of other countries – are conspiring to remove a political elected government and replace it with officials with the approval of the United States. “

Newly Installed Governor of the United States in Odessa

A few days after Yanukovych was sacked and fled from Kyiv, additional controversy broke out over the referendum in Crimea. Officials claimed that more than 95% of voters chose to join Russia, but the US painted it as an invasion of Russia.9 Then, on May 30, 2015, former Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili – “an old friend of America” ​​- was appointed governor of southern Odessa of Ukraine.

“A quick look at his biography gives the idea that he is prepared for a special mission,” the film says.ten Saakashvili received a scholarship from the US Department of State and worked for a law firm in New York. He took part in the Rose Revolution in Georgia, which overthrew a legally elected president.

Soon after, Georgia announced its intention to join NATO and build new military bases right on Russia’s borders. Saakashvili was later charged with abuse of power, embezzlement, and other crimes, but he fled to America, where his friends in Washington found him on another assignment as governor of Odessa.

Not long ago, he renounced his Georgian citizenship to become a citizen of Ukraine. Adding to the anti-Russian rhetoric was the 2014 Malaysia Airlines jet crash, shot down by a rocketin Ukraine, killing 298 people.

The US and Ukraine blamed Russia, leading to immediate sanctions against the country. But a Russian report came to a different conclusion – that the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian rocket. According to the movie:11

“One might expect that these controversial results would again stir public interest in the investigation, but the tragedy of Malaysian flight MH17 played its part in the local game. great politics.

Therefore, it was soon forgotten. Target has been achieved. After the third wave of sanctions hit Russia, tensions between the two countries have skyrocketed, so the question is whether we really see the beginning of Cold War 2.0, and If so, what are our chances of surviving this moment? “

2022: Doomsday clock at 100 seconds to midnight

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists introduced the Doomsday Clock in 1947. It represented the countdown to nuclear annihilation around the globe. During the height of the Cold War, it came closest to midnight – 2 minutes – then cooled, lasting to 17 minutes in 1991.

In 2015, around the time the film was released, increased instability pushed the clocks back 3 minutes to midnight, due to the modernization of global nuclear weapons and “nuclear arsenals”. too big”, with world leaders not “acting with the speed or scale necessary to protect citizens from potential disaster.”twelfth At the time, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists read:

“The clock ticks from three minutes to midnight because international leaders are not doing their most important task – ensuring and preserving the health and vitality of human civilization.”

However, in an update released on January 20, 2022, the Bulletin reported that the world was at “the threshold of doom”, with the clock ticking from 100 seconds to midnight:13

“[T]he Clock is still the closest clock to the end of civilization because the world is still stuck in an extremely dangerous moment. In 2019, we call it the new anomaly, and unfortunately it persists… Leaders around the world must immediately commit to collaborating to innovate in the many ways and places available to reduce it. minimize existing risks.

Citizens of the world can and should organize to ask their leaders to do the same – and quickly. The thresholds of doom have nowhere to be crossed… Without quick and focused action, truly catastrophic events – events that could end civilization as we know it – have more likely to happen. As the Clock stands at 100 seconds to midnight, we are all threatened. The time is both dangerous and unsustainable, and the time to act is now. “





Source link

news7g

News7g: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button