Weather

Should the US Pay for Climate Flooding in Pakistan – Incapacitated Because of It?


Essay by Eric Worrall

According to Wikipedia, Since 1952, Pakistan has received 22 IMF bailouts, which is substantially funded by the United States. But clearly the United States still has a responsibility for climate compensation.

Pakistan floods spark debate: Should the US pay the price for climate disaster?

Even as Pakistan turns to donors around the world for aid to deal with its deadly and costly floods, many politicians and activists demand compensation from the United States and others. poor countries in terms of damage from global warming

Via Shannon Osaka
August 29, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. EDT

Since mid-June, torrential rain has transformed Pakistan’s landscape, engulfing villages and fields, destroying homes and killing at least 1,000 people. But if the loss of life is catastrophic, the financial damage is almost unimaginable: According to Pakistan’s Finance Minister, the damage to date will likely exceed 10 billion dollarsor a whopping 4 percent the country’s annual gross domestic product.

“Pakistan has faced the disastrous effects of climate change,” said Sherry Rehman, Pakistan’s Minister for Climate Change, speak at a press conference on Thursday. “Now, the most devastating monsoon rains in a decade are causing unrelenting devastation across the country.”

But even as Pakistan turns to donors around the world to ask for aidThere’s one thing the country almost certainly won’t get: Compensation from the countries – including the United States – that are most responsible for the emissions of planet-warming greenhouse gases.

One of the important issues is liability. The U.S. delegates were concerned that if a formal loss and damage fund was established, the United States might open itself up to lawsuits from poorer countries. John F. Kerry, the United States’ international climate envoy, said during the Glasgow summit: “We’re always thinking about the issue of liability.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-enosystem/2022/08/29/pakistan-floods-climate-change/

On the bright side, it’s good to read that John Kerry was once against handing over large sums of money by US taxpayers.

But the question arises – should Pakistan receive climate change aid or any other aid?

One of the main reasons Pakistan is bankruptBesides corrupt their glassesTo be they spend insane amounts of money to finance a large military and a nuclear weapons program.

They can also offer large sums of money to America’s enemies. A Pakistani security service helped establish the Taliban, but According to some sources Pakistan continues to maintain high-level links. The Taliban may have started as a US-backed resistance movement against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan – but in my opinion the Taliban have long appreciated their value to their interests. of the West.

Any international aid money received by Pakistan, regardless of the reason given for delivery, most of this money will be at risk of being stolen and much of the remainder will be split between their excessive military funding and support of America’s enemies. In my view, very little, if any, can reach the needy, who could really use some help.

I think most of us can think of better uses of American tax dollars than funding Pakistan’s corrupt elites and funding their hostile geopolitical games.

If despite this, you still want to help and believe that even a penny in the dollar is worth sending aid to flood victims in Pakistan, I recommend reading the economist Africa By James Shikwati Der Spiegel’s Interview”For God’s Sake, please stop the aid!“. The corrupt kleptocrats are the real cause of the suffering of the common people, have destroyed the economy of their country, completely dependent on foreign aid money to survive.

Sending money for any reason only prolongs misery and hinders the development of a more efficient Pakistani government. In my opinion, the suffering of ordinary people is a fundraising stage prop for those who are currently running Pakistan. None of the IMF’s 22 previous bailouts and who knows what else have improved the lives of ordinary Pakistanis. Why would another round of funding, whether it be climate remediation, flood relief or another IMF bailout, produce a different outcome than all previous handouts?



Source link

news7g

News7g: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button