If you feel like important data on COVID-19 has been missing since the start of the pandemic, it’s not on your mind. A presentation by The New York Times revealed that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has actually been collecting data for a long time – it just hasn’t released most of it.first
Data such as the number of hospitalizations in the United States for COVID-19 by age, race, and injection status will certainly be of interest to a large portion of the US population. The CDC has been collecting such data for more than a year but has not made it all public, the Times reported. What else has the CDC kept from the public?
First, data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters are lacking. While the CDC does release data on booster effectiveness in adults under 65, this does not include data for 18 to 49 year olds, a sizable percentage of the population – coincidentally? — was “the group least likely to benefit from the additional footage,” the Times pointed out.2
CDC Releases ‘Only A Small Part’ of Its COVID Data
According to CDC spokeswoman Kristen Nordlund, the agency hasn’t released all of the data “because, essentially, at the end of the day, it’s not ready for prime time.”3 However, the Times reported, “Another reason is fear that the information could be misinterpreted, Ms. Nordlund said.”4
Among the additional data that the CDC keeps silent is wastewater data, which can provide insight into the number of COVID-19 cases in different regions. The CDC only released a dashboard of wastewater data recently, although some states and cities have made it available to them since the pandemic began.5 Reportedly, several sources told the Times that the CDC “only publishes a small portion of the data it has collected”.
As the Times reported, the CDC’s refusal to post pertinent data puts local and state health departments at a disadvantage:6
“Much of the information withheld could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to control the virus. Timely, detailed data on hospital admissions by age and race will help health officials identify and help populations most at risk.
Information on hospitalizations and deaths by age and immunization status will help inform whether healthy adults need booster shots. And nationwide wastewater monitoring will detect outbreaks and emerging variants early. “
Data withheld over fear of creating ‘vaccine procrastination’
The Times spoke with public health experts who said they begged the CDC to release this kind of COVID-19 data for two years and were “stunned” to learn the agency had it all.
The logical conclusion is, if the data reveals what the CDC wants, it will release it. However, in their official rationale, Nordlund said the data only represents 10% of the US population, using that as an argument for why it didn’t release it. “But the CDC has relied on the same level of sampling to track the flu for years,” the Times pointed out. Furthermore, it notes:7
“[T]The CDC has been regularly gathering information since the Covid vaccine was first released last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public because they could be misinterpreted because the vaccine isn’t effective, the official said.
Misunderstand? “Be clear,” writes Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation.8 “The only way vaccine data can be interpreted by us as ineffective by those who ‘spread disinformation’ is if the data shows that the vaccine doesn’t work… The truth is the data doesn’t support it. their narrative assistant so they hid it. Do you think they would hide the data if it showed the vaccine worked? Of course not!”
In short, he wrote, “CDC acknowledges that it withheld data from the public because it did not want to create hesitancy about vaccines.”9 Transparency with data is key to building public trust and fostering open scientific debate, not to mention providing appropriate guidelines for public health. Now that we know the CDC withheld the data, possibly because its numbers don’t support the story they made. Gateway Pundit wrote:ten
“Too much for the bogus lie has been pushed by public health officials for months, claiming that breakthrough infections go completely untracked. The medical elite only decided to withhold the data because it did not fit the approved narrative, and they naturally blamed the possibility of ‘misinformation’ as justification for the cover-up. . “
In a tweet, Dr. Nicole Saphier, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, shared her disappointment when it was discovered that the CDC actively censored what data to share with the public:11
“The CDC’s response when asked about their withholding of Covid data and lack of transparency was essentially ‘we don’t trust you can understand the facts’. The condescension is palpable. The wheels are finally about to explode. “
Scotland stops publishing COVID data by injection status
Not only in the US but health officials are gathering data to support an agenda. Public Health Scotland (PHS) in February 2022 announced that it would stop publishing COVID-19 mortality and hospitalization data by injection status. Like the CDC, their rationale was concern that the data would be misrepresented by anti-vaxxers.twelfth
The problem with the data, however, is that it doesn’t lie – assuming it is presented in its complete, error-free form. The only way such data could raise concerns about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 shots is if it shows them to be ineffective and unsafe.
Now, instead of releasing the full data for public analysis and explicit consent, CDC plans to “do a lot more on the effectiveness of vaccines and try to make people understand the effectiveness of vaccines.” of vaccines”.13 It’s the kind of united front across the globe that many patriots, including former BlackRock portfolio manager Edward Dowd, call bad. He say:14
“The response of governments to this virus that doesn’t kill 99.9% of us is meaningless. And all are united in their determination to include these systems – these digital passport/vaccination systems. All of them are globally synchronized. They all wanted us to get these stabs, and it was too uniform. I suspect there is a problem on the way. ”
CDC Withholding Data Is Scientific Fraud
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the core technology that underpins the mRNA and DNA vaccines, believes that the CDC’s withholding of evidence about the safety of injecting COVID-19 is scientific fraud.15 He called on Americans to request full COVID-19 data from the CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration, as well as those in the government who lied to the American people to be held accountable:16
“If the CDC releases age-stratified data for COVID, it is clear that vaccination is not necessary for most Americans. If vaccine risk ratios for vaccinated and hospitalized individuals are published for Omicron – it is clear that vaccine benefit is not observed.
The FDA has not disclosed the effectiveness of the booster for children. They did not publish safety data. They have withheld vaccine safety data for children and adults.
This must stop. We’re diving into total Science Fraud territory. Remember where this all started… We’ve been manipulated since the very beginning of this VERY MUCH. The government has been deciding what is written, erased, censored by the media and the big tech giants. This is propaganda.”
Even Dr Yvonne Maldonado, chair of the Infectious Diseases Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), told The New York Times that it had asked the CDC for data on children hospitalized with COVID- 19, such as the percentage of children with medical conditions. In an information call with the CDC, they were told no data was available.17
The AAP also tried to find out from the CDC in many cases how contagious people were in the 5 days after COVID-19 symptoms started, but to no avail, only learning from an article on The New York Times they followed in December 2021. “They’ve been “I’ve known this for over a year and a half, yes, and they haven’t told us,” she told the Times. “I mean, you can’t find anything out of them.”18
Should the US encourage booster injections for children?
Malone is among those who have called the task of injecting COVID-19 “completely unreasonable” for children19 and recommends that young adults who have been vaccinated with COVID-19 have their hearts checked for damage,20 there is a real risk of myocarditis and heart damage.
The United States is also a global leader in recommending that children 12 years of age and older receive not only a COVID-19 shot, but a booster shot as well.21 While many countries are recommending caution in COVID-19 shots and boosters for children, the CDC is moving ahead, while hiding data that could help US parents make informed decisions. Make informed decisions for their children.
In the video above, author David Zweig explains that he interviewed a member of the CDC’s advisory committee and learned that the main motive for the agency’s recommendation to vaccinate children for COVID-19 is not to prevent it. severe illness, but rather to prevent mild or even asymptomatic illness. infection. Furthermore, an official told him that even this may only be beneficial for about two months, before the antibody boost begins to wane.22
The data presented at the meeting also showed that for young men, vaccination increased the risk of injection-induced myocarditis enough to negate any benefit in avoiding COVID-19 hospitalization. . “So we had to really think about whether this is a worthwhile endeavor, and certainly one that should be commissioned,” Zweig said.
Interestingly, CDC officials spent an hour of the meeting discussing whether they should use the word “may” or “should” when recommending COVID-19 vaccinations for children, and they decided ” Candlestick”. Zweig says the term could eventually lead to quests as the next step.23
In the face of false rumors that the CDC has withheld COVID-19 data from the American people, parents and individuals must seek the truth beyond these official sources. As Kirsch said, “Be clear. The CDC hid the data because it proved they were lying to us. That’s the real reason. If the data is favorable, I assure you, they will release it.”24
