After the outbreak of war and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it became clear that the whole “GREEN THINKING” was the result of a long-term fifth column operation supported by Russia and promoted damaging activities. of Putin’s “useful idiots” in “environmental organisations”, in Western academia, and in Governments throughout the Western world.
This destructive process was recognized by NATO leader Anders Fogh Rasmussen in 2014. One great way to damage Western economies is to make their electricity production unreliable and costly. least.
That GREEN THINKING goal has been imposed by Government policy but has no universal mandate throughout the Western world. Western actions if not accepted by the whole world will have negligible effect on the Climate and can never save the World from “Man-made Climate Change”.
But the West’s Climate policies and actions have caused incalculable and fruitless harm to Western economies and Western people.
Man-made climate change
Bjorn Lomborg’s view is correct that anthropogenic climate change between now and the future is a relatively minor global problem among many others. Any relatively small warming could be more beneficial than detrimental.
Man-made global warming is certainly not an immediate and immediate global catastrophe caused by the burning of fossil fuels.
As a matter of fact, Man-made Climate Change has been deliberately blown out of proportion as a mechanism for undermining the West.
There is certainly no reason to destroy the economy of the Western world against it.
The logarithmic drop in CO2’s effectiveness as a warming agent means that any future anthropogenic CO2 emissions may now be small. This view has been tested by Will Happer, a former scientific adviser to the US government. The IPCC, (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), also understands this well in their detailed reports, but significant mitigation impacts are never acknowledged in the IPCC Summary for policy makers.
“Renewable energy” can never work effectively to support a developed Country
Their capacity or capacity percentage of power output Their productivity is worse than conventional power generation and their reliable yield is really important.
As Professor David Mackay FRS, (former scientific director at the UK Department of Energy), said in his last interview before his death in 2016, the promotion of “Renewable Energy” is a “horrifying illusions” caused by people who don’t understand the math, engineering and practicality of Energy technologies.
Has anyone ever bought a car that only works one day of the year and when you never know what day it could be?
When EIA estimates of the US cost of electricity generation are combined with the recorded productivity over a 40-year life, “Renewables” turn out to be very expensive for the energy they can produce.
Notes about the author:
Some supporting documents: