CyberArk vs BeyondTrust | Compare IAM . solutions

It’s time to upgrade your IAM software, but which security tool should you choose? See how CyberArk and BeyondTrust features compare.

Select one identity and access management solutions Not a trivial task. CyberArk and BeyondTrust use the most advanced technologies to protect systems, manage passwords, and otherwise control and protect the use of sensitive data.

SEE: How to Hire and Hire a Security Analyst (TechRepublic Premium)

What is CyberArk?

CyberArk is an information security company providing IAM, PAM and security solutions. These solutions prevent unauthorized access to critical systems, manage passwords, and track the use of sensitive data.

Some of the key features offered by CyberArk include password storage, session monitoring, file integrity monitoring, secure remote access, and threat detection.

What is BeyondTrust?

BeyondTrust is a security company that provides solutions for vulnerability management, privileged account management, and data protection. Its products are intended to help organizations secure their systems and data from internal and external threats.

Some of the key features offered by BeyondTrust include asset detection, vulnerability assessment, patch management, password and credential management, and privileged access control. They also provide solutions for the cloud and virtual and mobile environments.

CyberArk vs BeyondTrust head-to-head chart

Both CyberArk and BeyondTrust are powerful systems that are highly rated and trusted by users. Both will provide best-in-class IAM management and both are rated as industry leaders by Gartner Magic Quadrant.

CyberArk Features vs. BeyondTrust

In general, CyberArk focuses on accounts, while BeyondTrust focuses on assets. This difference in philosophy represents two notably different security models.

CyberArk’s account-centric approach relies on managing privileged access, account user behavior, and account privileges. For companies where users have accounts on multiple devices, CyberArk’s approach may be more appropriate. Agentless asset discovery can quickly identify all assets (including devices, operating systems, and applications) in an organization’s network. CyberArk will recognize when an account is logged into a new system or device, for quick access management.

BeyondTrust’s asset-centric approach relies on scanning the environment to secure an organization’s digital assets. This platform, which supports remote access, provides agentless asset discovery to help organizations inventory their systems and understand where vulnerabilities may exist. BeyondTrust is asset-based — concerned with the security of individual assets.

On the other hand, both CyberArk and BeyondTrust have similar features and advantages. Which solution is best for your organization largely depends on the assets you need to protect, the size of your organization, and your organization’s potential security risks.

simple and easy to use

For starters, CyberArk has a significant learning curve. Many small and medium-sized organizations may be able to hire an expert to implement the solution themselves, rather than implementing it internally. Although documentation is available, it may be incomplete and inconsistent. A managed service provider may be required to organize the transition to CyberArk.

In comparison, BeyondTrust’s solutions are quite easy to use and deploy. BeyondTrust has many features such as Smart Rules, Smart Groups, and Direct Connections, all of which aim to make the overall user experience of BeyondTrust easier, thereby improving overall productivity.

Audience

While CyberArk can theoretically manage up to 100,000 endpoints, the maximum real-world deployment is 57,000. However, CyberArk is more likely to be used by enterprise-level organizations, while BeyondTrust is more popular with small and mid-sized businesses.

CyberArk’s features, functionality, and complexity make enterprise-class organizations better. Meanwhile, BeyondTrust’s simplicity, ease of use, and painless implementation make it a better choice for smaller companies and midsize organizations.

Display

CyberArk’s web interface is desirable, and features and functions provided through the web interface are not always the same as those offered elsewhere — potentially leading to confusion, especially about API configuration.

BeyondTrust offers a clean, attractive HTML5 interface, although some users find it lacking in more advanced features, such as group approvals. While the BeyondTrust interface may not have as robust a feature set as CyberArk, it is easier to use.

Choosing between CyberArk and BeyondTrust

CyberArk and BeyondTrust are relatively evenly matched IAM solutions, with a lot going for them. Today, BeyondTrust is the leading competitor in the field, but CyberArk is behind.

Choose CyberArk if:

• You need a comprehensive IAM solution that can support on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments.
• You need an IAM solution with privileged access management built in.
• You are interested in an IAM solution that puts account management and account security first.
• You are not afraid of a complex IAM solution.

Choose BeyondTrust if:

• You need an IAM solution focused on secure remote access and compliant with regulatory standards.
• You need an IAM solution with powerful patch management and vulnerability assessment features.
• You are interested in an IAM solution that puts asset management and security first.
• You need a solution that’s quick and easy to deploy.

Ultimately, CyberArk and BeyondTrust are powerful IAM solutions that can help organizations manage their critical assets and protect from data breaches. When choosing between CyberArk and BeyondTrust, first consider your organization’s needs, requirements, and resources.