Weather

Ban the next anesthesia?! Doctor recommends ‘reducing anesthetic gas flow’ in patients to save the planet – 1 hour of surgical anesthesia is equivalent to driving up to 470 miles


From Climate Warehouse

Anesthesia the next target in the climate battle: The documents suggest reducing anesthesia: Do you suffer to fight climate change?

NY Post: Experts are now recommending that doctors reduce the use of certain anesthetics to combat the effects of climate change. Dr. Mohamed Fayed, senior anesthesiologist at Henry Ford Health, Detroit, made suggestions during the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Last Friday in Orlando, Florida. “Global warming is affecting our daily lives more and more and reducing greenhouse gas emissions has become important,” he said. Dr. Fayed added, “No matter how small each impact, it adds up. As anesthesiologists, we can make a significant contribution to this cause by making small changes to our daily practice — such as reducing anesthetic gas flow — without compromising patient care.”

The study notes that inhaled anesthetics account for 0.1% of the world’s carbon emissions, which is considered a major cause of global climate change. One hour of surgery using inhaled anesthetic is equivalent to driving 470 miles, According to a 2010 study.

#

2020 Retrospective Study in the Journal of the American Cancer Society 2020 Confused about ‘carbon footprints in cancer care’ – ACS Journal: “Climate Change and Cancer” – Excerpt: “To date, no study has estimated carbon emissions in cancer care…Energy costs associated with transportation The operation of cancer treatment facilities and medical devices, as well as the manufacturing, packaging and transportation of equipment and pharmaceutical products, contribute significantly to the greenhouse gas emissions of cancer care… Some cancer facilities have begun looking at their own carbon footprint and have begun a process to achieve carbon neutrality.”

Climate Depot’s Morano: “Here’s a question for the American Cancer Society: If you needed cancer treatment, would you go to a cancer center worried about its carbon footprint? Or one worried about providing the best possible modern care?”

Via: Marc Morano

https://nypost.com/2023/01/30/doctors-recommend-cutting-anesthesia-to-combat-climate-change/

The documents suggest reducing anesthesia: Do you suffer to fight climate change?

Via Adriana Diaz

Experts are now recommending that doctors reduce the use of certain anesthetics to combat the effects of climate change.

Dr. Mohamed Fayed, senior anesthesiologist at Henry Ford Health, Detroit, made suggestions during the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Last Friday in Orlando, Florida. (LINK)

“Global warming is affecting our daily lives more and more and reducing greenhouse gas emissions has become important,” he said.

Dr. Fayed added, “No matter how small each impact, it adds up. As anesthesiologists, we can make a significant contribution to this cause by making small changes to our daily practice — such as reducing anesthetic gas flow — without compromising patient care.”

The study notes that inhaled anesthetics account for 0.1% of the world’s carbon emissions, which is considered a major cause of global climate change.

One hour of surgery using inhaled anesthetic is equivalent to driving 470 miles, According to a 2010 study.

Most general anesthetic procedures require a high flow of fresh air at the start and end of the procedure to quickly achieve the desired effect. However, according to Fayed, lowering traffic at other times is safe and effective.

Anesthesia must be performed expertly: Too much medication can lead to brain damage, coma, or even death. But too little can mean a patient wakes up during the procedure and experiences severe pain, not to mention psychological trauma.

For their study, researchers from Henry Ford Health reduced air flow in an effort to reduce anesthetic use to less than 3 liters per minute per surgery whenever possible.

This effort has focused solely on the use of inhaled anesthetics and has dramatically reduced its use, sometimes by as much as half.

Medical professionals at Henry Ford Health also removed desflurane from all operating rooms, noting that it produces the most significant carbon dioxide emissions.

Data were collected from 13,000 patients anesthetized from March 2021 to July 2021. Prior to intervention, 65% of cases were limited to a threshold of 3 L/m. In the end, 93% of cases get there.

Dr Fayed said: “For a long time, it was thought that the greenhouse effect in healthcare settings was an unavoidable and unavoidable cost of providing care. patient care.

“But we already know that reducing anesthetic gas flow is one of the many ways healthcare can reduce its contribution to the global warming crisis, along with reducing waste, turning off lights and devices when not in use and challenge practice, as long as they do not compromise patient care.”

The researchers are now aiming to reduce clean air flow levels to less than 2 L/m throughout the system.

#

Study in the Journal of the American Cancer Society 2020 Confused about ‘carbon footprint in cancer care’ From 2020: ACS Magazine: “Climate change and cancer” – Excerpt: “To date, no studies have estimated the carbon footprint of cancer care…The energy costs associated with running cancer facilities and medical equipment, as well as the process manufacturing, packaging, and shipping processes for equipment and pharmaceuticals contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions in cancer care…Some cancer facilities have begun to look at their own carbon footprint. and start a process to achieve carbon neutrality. However, the percentage of health care facilities reporting environmentally sustainable practices is lower than in other economic sectors.”

Climate Depot’s Morano: “Here’s a question for the American Cancer Society: If you needed cancer treatment, would you go to a cancer center worried about its carbon footprint? Or one worried about providing the best possible modern care?”

How many can they come up with? Surgery causes global warming?! Study shows ‘Anesthesia agent is the biggest potential contributor to global warming’Statement: ‘Anesthesia used by a busy hospital contributes as much to global warming as emissions from hundreds of cars each year’-

Statement: General anesthesia in surgery is contributing to climate changeSwitching from a general anesthetic to a local anesthetic could help cut greenhouse gas emissions and ultimately help reduce global warming, a new study claims. While a regional anesthetic numbs a certain part of the body, a general anesthetic leaves the patient completely unconscious for procedures that tend to be more serious. But unlike regional anesthetics, generals use volatile and environmentally unfriendly halogenated substances, such as desflurane or nitrous oxide. … ‘Green zone’ anesthesia: non-polluting benefits of regional anesthesia to reduce greenhouse gases and reduce climate change

news7g

News7g: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button